Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
For the Respondent: Mr M Sowerby of Counsel instructed by Indra Sebastian Solicitors.
This is an appeal against the decision of First-tier Tribunal Judge Davey promulgated on 10 June 2015, allowing the appeal of Mr Randeer Harindu Sulakshan Liyanapathiran against a decision of the Secretary of State for the Home Department dated 22 March 2014 to refuse to issue a Derivative Residence Card.
Although before me the Secretary of State is the appellant and Mr Liyanapathiran is the respondent, for the sake of consistency with the proceedings before the First-tier Tribunal I shall hereafter refer to Mr Liyanapathiran as the Appellant and the Secretary of State as the Respondent.
The Appellant's personal details and immigration history are a matter of record on file and known to the parties; they are also set out in the body of the decision of the First-tier Tribunal. It is unnecessary to re-rehearse such matters here; I refer to any pertinent matters as is incidental for the purposes of this decision.
The Appellant's application for a Derivative Residence Card was based on his claim to be the primary carer of Ms Nawalage Harischandra, a British citizen born on 23 Aug 1932.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.