Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
For the Respondent: Miss A Faryl, Counsel instructed by Broudie Jackson Canter Solicitors
The Respondent before the Upper Tribunal was the Appellant before the First-tier Tribunal. I will refer to him as the Claimant.
The Claimant appealed to the First-tier Tribunal against the Respondent�s decision dated 25 th May 2012 to refuse him entry clearance to the United Kingdom as the child of a refugee. The application was refused with reference to paragraph 352D(iv) of the Immigration Rules, the Entry Clearance Officer (ECO) not accepting that the claimant was part of the Sponsor�s family unit at the time that the Sponsor left Zimbabwe to seek asylum.
The appeal was heard by Judge of the First-tier Tribunal M Davies on 13 th November 2013 and allowed on the basis that the judge was satisfied that the Claimant and Sponsor were living in a family unit until the Sponsor departed from Zimbabwe in 2002.
The ECO applied for permission to appeal contending that the FTT had given inadequate reasons for allowing the appeal.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.