Reverting to paragraph 12 of the decision, we conclude that the Industrial Tribunal majority correctly asked itself the question, was the employer's repudiatory breach the effective cause of the Appellant's resignation? They answered that question in the negative on the basis of their findings:
(a) that he left to take another job and
(b) that had he not left the respondent he would have remained and affirmed the contract with the new terms and conditions proposed by the respondent.
In these circumstances, the Tribunal were entitled to find that it was not a repudiatory breach which caused his resignation. The Appellant did not accept the repudiation and therefore, there was no constructive dismissal.
We therefore see no grounds for interfering with this Industrial Tribunal decision and the appeal is dismissed.