Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
             The Appellant is a citizen of India born on 29 August 1985. He appealed the decision of the Respondent dated 7 April 2022 which refused his application for leave to remain on the basis of his family and private life in the UK.
             That appeal came before First-tier Tribunal Judge Murray sitting at Newport on 20 September 2022.
             Having considered the documentary and oral evidence Judge Murray set out her findings from [13] of the determination.
             The Appellant's human rights application is predicated upon his relationship with Mr Andrew Smith, a British citizen, who has lived his entire life in the UK where his family live, including his elderly mother.
             At [16] Judge Murray records that the Respondent accepted that the Appellant and Mr Smith are in a genuine and subsisting relationship but that the factors relied upon did not amount to insurmountable obstacles or very significant obstacles to integration.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.