Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
AND UPON hearing Mr J. Hitchens of Counsel for the applicant instructed by Lawstop Solicitors and Mr L. Parkhill instructed by Invicta Law, for the respondent at a hearing at Field House, London on 10-13 May and 16 May 2022
AND UPON handing down the reserved judgment at Bradford IAC on 6 th July 2022, pursuant to (i) the draft judgment being circulated to the parties under embargo terms on 17 June 2022, (ii) both parties providing typographical and obvious corrections to the judgment by the time requested, (iii) the parties being notified that judgment would be handed down on 6 July 2022, with neither party to attend provided there was no consequential matters to be dealt with and UPON the parties agreeing a draft order and confirming that neither advocate would seek to attend.
(1)           The Claim for judicial review is allowed
(2)           The Respondent's age assessment of the Applicant dated 29 January 2021 is quashed
(3)           It is declared that the Applicant was born on 20 December 2002 for the reasons given in the judgment handed down on the 6 July 2022.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.