Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The claimant�s claim in respect of redundancy pay is well-founded and it is ordered that the respondent shall pay to the claimant the sum of �1050.00 in respect of redundancy pay.
The respondent company has ceased trading.� The respondent has presented a response confirming that the claimant is entitled to a Redundancy Payment.
The claimant worked for the respondent from 1 November 2006 until 31 March 2009 as a Youth Counsellor.� She was made redundant on the latter date when the business ceased trading.� She therefore had two years� completed service.
5.������ This is a relevant decision for the purposes of the Industrial Tribunals (Interest) Order (Northern Ireland) 1990.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.