Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
For the Respondent: Miss N Nnamani of Counsel instructed by Howe & Company Solicitors
I mention this simply by way of background because the First-tier Judge rejected the appellant's claim under the Refugee Convention accepting there had been a fundamental change in Colombia. The appeal was allowed under Article 8 and there was no cross appeal or challenge to the other aspects of the judge's decision. The judge heard from the appellant and his parents and his fiancée and sister.
The judge in paragraph 36 of her determination sets out the sentencing remarks following the appellant's conviction at Blackfriars Crown Court on 10 February 2011. On 24 March 2011 the appellant was sentenced to concurrent terms of imprisonment of three years in respect of counts 2 to 4 and nine months' imprisonment in respect of count 1. The judge stated as follows:
The judge noted what had been said to the probation service but stated as follows in paragraph 38 of her decision:
Having referred to the evidence of the appellant's parents the judge stated at paragraph 41 of her decision as follows:
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.