Cream et al. v. Davidson
Court headnote
Cream et al. v. Davidson Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1897-05-01 Report (1897) 27 SCR 362 Judges Girouard, Désiré; Gwynne, John Wellington; King, George Edwin; Sedgewick, Robert; Strong, Samuel Henry On appeal from Quebec Subjects Estates Decision Content Supreme Court of Canada Cream et al v. Davidson, (1897) 27 SCR 362 Date: 1897-05-01 CREAM, et al v. DAVIDSON. 1897: Feb 26; 1897: May 1 PRESENT:—Sir Henry Strong C.J. and Gwynne, Sedgewick, King and Girouard JJ. Testamentary succession Balance due by tutor Executors—Account, action for—Action for provisional possession—Parties to action. APPEAL from a decision of the Court of Queen's Bench for Lower Canada (appeal side) ([1]), which reversed the judgment of the Superior Court, district of Quebec, and dismissed the appellant's action and incidental demand. After hearing counsel for both parties the court re-served judgment and on a subsequent day dismissed the appeal but gave no written reasons. Appeal dismissed with costs. Stuart Q.C. for the appellant. Cook Q.C. and Davidson for the respondent. [1] Q. R. 6 Q. B. 34. …
Read full judgment
Cream et al. v. Davidson Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1897-05-01 Report (1897) 27 SCR 362 Judges Girouard, Désiré; Gwynne, John Wellington; King, George Edwin; Sedgewick, Robert; Strong, Samuel Henry On appeal from Quebec Subjects Estates Decision Content Supreme Court of Canada Cream et al v. Davidson, (1897) 27 SCR 362 Date: 1897-05-01 CREAM, et al v. DAVIDSON. 1897: Feb 26; 1897: May 1 PRESENT:—Sir Henry Strong C.J. and Gwynne, Sedgewick, King and Girouard JJ. Testamentary succession Balance due by tutor Executors—Account, action for—Action for provisional possession—Parties to action. APPEAL from a decision of the Court of Queen's Bench for Lower Canada (appeal side) ([1]), which reversed the judgment of the Superior Court, district of Quebec, and dismissed the appellant's action and incidental demand. After hearing counsel for both parties the court re-served judgment and on a subsequent day dismissed the appeal but gave no written reasons. Appeal dismissed with costs. Stuart Q.C. for the appellant. Cook Q.C. and Davidson for the respondent. [1] Q. R. 6 Q. B. 34.
Source: decisions.scc-csc.ca