Nabila v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
Source text
Nabila v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2006-08-09 Neutral citation 2006 FC 960 File numbers IMM-4387-06 Decision Content Date: 20060809 Docket: IMM-4387-06 Citation: 2006 FC 960 Ottawa, Ontario, August 9, 2006 Present: The Honourable Mr. Justice Shore BETWEEN: PARVEN NABILA Applicant and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER (Delivered from the bench.) Upon motion by the applicant for a stay of a removal order enforceable as of tomorrow, August 10, 2006, at 8:00 a.m. [1] Having heard the parties and for the reasons delivered from the bench, this application to stay the execution of a removal order must be dismissed. [2] The applicant was unable to establish to the Court’s satisfaction any of the three conjunctive conditions for obtaining a stay. [3] The balance of convenience is in the Minister’s favour. Under section 48 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, S.C. 2001, c. 27, a removal order must be enforced as soon as is reasonably practicable. [4] The record shows no serious question to be argued. ORDER THE COURT ORDERS THAT this application for a stay be dismissed. “Michel M.J. Shore” Judge Certified true translation Michael Palles FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: IMM-4387-06 STYLE OF CAUSE: PARVEN NABILA v. MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION PLACE OF HEARING: Ottawa, Ontario DATE OF HEARING: Heard by conference call on August 9, 2006 REASONS FOR ORD…
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Nabila v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2006-08-09 Neutral citation 2006 FC 960 File numbers IMM-4387-06 Decision Content Date: 20060809 Docket: IMM-4387-06 Citation: 2006 FC 960 Ottawa, Ontario, August 9, 2006 Present: The Honourable Mr. Justice Shore BETWEEN: PARVEN NABILA Applicant and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER (Delivered from the bench.) Upon motion by the applicant for a stay of a removal order enforceable as of tomorrow, August 10, 2006, at 8:00 a.m. [1] Having heard the parties and for the reasons delivered from the bench, this application to stay the execution of a removal order must be dismissed. [2] The applicant was unable to establish to the Court’s satisfaction any of the three conjunctive conditions for obtaining a stay. [3] The balance of convenience is in the Minister’s favour. Under section 48 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, S.C. 2001, c. 27, a removal order must be enforced as soon as is reasonably practicable. [4] The record shows no serious question to be argued. ORDER THE COURT ORDERS THAT this application for a stay be dismissed. “Michel M.J. Shore” Judge Certified true translation Michael Palles FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: IMM-4387-06 STYLE OF CAUSE: PARVEN NABILA v. MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION PLACE OF HEARING: Ottawa, Ontario DATE OF HEARING: Heard by conference call on August 9, 2006 REASONS FOR ORDER BY: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHORE DATED: August 9, 2006 APPEARANCES: Sangaré Salif FOR THE APPLICANT Steve Bell FOR THE RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: SANGARÉ SALIF, LAWYER Montréal, Quebec FOR THE APPLICANT JOHN H. SIMS, Q.C. Deputy Attorney General of Canada FOR THE RESPONDENT
Source: decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca
Quebec (Attorney General) v A
[2013] 1 SCR 61