Qiu v. v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)

Qiu v. v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
Court (s) Database
Federal Court Decisions
Date
2016-07-26
Neutral citation
2016 FC 875
File numbers
IMM-4974-15
Decision Content
Date: 20160726
Docket: IMM-4974-15
Citation: 2016 FC 875
Toronto, Ontario, July 26, 2016
PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Hughes
BETWEEN:
BINGHONG QIU
GIULAN ZHU
ZHIHENG QIU
Applicants
and
THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION
Respondent
ORDER AND REASONS AS TO A CERTIFIED QUESTION
[1] On June 30, 2016, I gave Judgment in this matter, with Reasons, wherein I set aside that part of the decision under review which determined that the Applicants’ claim had no credible basis and returned the matter to the Refugee Protection Division with a direction that an amended decision be issued wherein the finding of credible basis was to be removed. I invited the parties to make submissions as to a certified question.
[2] I have received written submissions as to a certified question from Counsel for each of the parties. In brief the Respondent Minister seeks a certified question, the Applicants do not.
[3] The recent amendments to the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act and Regulations providing for an appeal to the Refugee Appeal Division from a decision of the Refugee Protection Division have created some procedural difficulties including, as is the case here, where a finding of “no credible basis” for a refugee claim is made. I discussed this in my reasons of June 30, 2016.
[4] I proposed a solution in my Judgment of June 30, 2016. Justice Phelan of this Court proposed a different procedure in his decisions in Mahdi v Canada (MCI), 2016 FC 218. In my opinion it is appropriate to seek the guidance of the Federal Court of Appeal in this matter. I will therefor certify the question proposed by the Respondent.
ORDER
THIS COURT ORDERS that the following question is certified.
Does the Federal Court have jurisdiction under paragraph 18.1(3)(b) of the Federal Courts Act to issue a direction requiring the Refugee Protection Division to remove from its decision a finding that there is no credible basis for a claim, thereby granting a right of appeal to the Refugee Appeal Division, which would otherwise be precluded by paragraph 110(2)(c) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act?
"Roger T. Hughes"
Judge
FEDERAL COURT
SOLICITORS OF RECORD
Docket:
IMM-4974-15
STYLE OF CAUSE:
BINGHONG QIU, GIULAN ZHU, ZHIHENG QIU v THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION
ORDER and reasons:
HUGHES J.
DATED:
July 26, 2016
WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS WITHOUT PERSONAL APPEARANCES
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Lewis & Associates
Barristers and Solicitors
Toronto, Ontario
For The Applicants
William F. Pentney
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
For The Respondent