Perrault v. Canada
Source text
Perrault v. Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2006-07-31 Neutral citation 2006 FCA 269 File numbers A-15-05 Decision Content Date: 20060731 Docket: A-15-05 Citation: 2006 FCA 269 Between: ANDRÉ PERRAULT Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent ASSESSMENT OF COSTS – REASONS MICHELLE LAMY, ASSESSMENT OFFICER [1] This is the assessment of costs to be paid to the respondent following the judgement dated January 17, 2006. As requested, the assessment was made without the personal appearance of the parties. Up to now, we have not received any answer to our letter dated May 2, 2006 establishing a timetable for written submissions. [2] In the circumstances, the respondent’s fees are awarded in an amount of $1,120.08 for the following items of Tariff B: 19 (5 units), 22 (2 units x 0.667 hours), 25 (1 unit) and 26 (2 units). I reduced the number of units for the assessment to 2 because it was not contested. As far as the disbursements are concerned in this file, they are awarded as requested in an amount of $145.36. [3] In conclusion, the respondent’s costs are assessed in an amount of $1,265.44. A certificate is issued for this amount. DATED IN MONTRÉAL, THE 31ST DAY OF JULY 2006 “Michelle Lamy” MICHELLE LAMY ASSESSMENT OFFICER Certified true translation Michael Palles FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-15-05 BETWEEN: ANDRÉ PERRAULT Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent ASSESSMENT OF COSTS IN WRITING PLACE OF ASSESSMENT: Montréal…
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Perrault v. Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2006-07-31 Neutral citation 2006 FCA 269 File numbers A-15-05 Decision Content Date: 20060731 Docket: A-15-05 Citation: 2006 FCA 269 Between: ANDRÉ PERRAULT Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent ASSESSMENT OF COSTS – REASONS MICHELLE LAMY, ASSESSMENT OFFICER [1] This is the assessment of costs to be paid to the respondent following the judgement dated January 17, 2006. As requested, the assessment was made without the personal appearance of the parties. Up to now, we have not received any answer to our letter dated May 2, 2006 establishing a timetable for written submissions. [2] In the circumstances, the respondent’s fees are awarded in an amount of $1,120.08 for the following items of Tariff B: 19 (5 units), 22 (2 units x 0.667 hours), 25 (1 unit) and 26 (2 units). I reduced the number of units for the assessment to 2 because it was not contested. As far as the disbursements are concerned in this file, they are awarded as requested in an amount of $145.36. [3] In conclusion, the respondent’s costs are assessed in an amount of $1,265.44. A certificate is issued for this amount. DATED IN MONTRÉAL, THE 31ST DAY OF JULY 2006 “Michelle Lamy” MICHELLE LAMY ASSESSMENT OFFICER Certified true translation Michael Palles FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-15-05 BETWEEN: ANDRÉ PERRAULT Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent ASSESSMENT OF COSTS IN WRITING PLACE OF ASSESSMENT: Montréal, Quebec REASONS BY MICHELLE LAMY, TAXATION OFFICER DATED: July 31, 2006 SOLICITORS OF RECORD: André Perrault Boucherville, Quebec For the appellant (on his own behalf) John H. Sims, Q.C. Deputy Attorney General of Canada Ottawa, Ontario For the respondent
Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca
Quebec (Attorney General) v A
[2013] 1 SCR 61