Skip to main content
Supreme Court of Canada· 1910

Smith v. Sugarman

(1910) 47 SCR 392
GeneralJD
Cite or share
Share via WhatsAppEmail
Showing the official court-reporter headnote. An editorial brief (facts · issues · held · ratio · significance) is on the roadmap for this case. The judgment text below is the authoritative source.

Court headnote

Smith v. Sugarman Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1910-06-15 Report (1910) 47 SCR 392 Judges Girouard, Désiré; Davies, Louis Henry; Idington, John; Duff, Lyman Poore; Anglin, Francis Alexander On appeal from Alberta Subjects Bankruptcy and insolvency Decision Content Supreme Court of Canada Smith v. Sugarman, (1910) 47 S.C.R. 392 Date: 1910-06-15 Smith; v. Sugarman and others 1910: May 10, 11; 1910: June 15. Present:—Girouard, Davies, Idington, Duff and Anglin JJ. ON APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ALBERTA. Assignment—Insolvency—Preference—Trust—Statute of Frauds. APPEAL from the judgment of the Supreme Court of the Province of Alberta[1], reversing the judgment of Beck J., at the trial[2], and dismissing the plaintiff's (appellant's) action with costs. On the appeal by the plaintiff, the Supreme Court of Canada, after hearing counsel on behalf of both parties, reserved judgment and, on a subsequent day, the appeal was allowed and the judgment of the trial judge was restored, with costs in the Supreme Court of Canada and in the court appealed from. Appeal allowed with costs. C. A. Grant for the appellant. Wallace Nesbitt K.C. for the respondents. [1] 3 Alta. L.R. 108. [2] 2 Alta. L.R. 442. …

Read full judgment
Smith v. Sugarman
Collection
Supreme Court Judgments
Date
1910-06-15
Report
(1910) 47 SCR 392
Judges
Girouard, Désiré; Davies, Louis Henry; Idington, John; Duff, Lyman Poore; Anglin, Francis Alexander
On appeal from
Alberta
Subjects
Bankruptcy and insolvency
Decision Content
Supreme Court of Canada
Smith v. Sugarman, (1910) 47 S.C.R. 392
Date: 1910-06-15
Smith;
v.
Sugarman and others
1910: May 10, 11; 1910: June 15.
Present:—Girouard, Davies, Idington, Duff and Anglin JJ.
ON APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ALBERTA.
Assignment—Insolvency—Preference—Trust—Statute of Frauds. APPEAL from the judgment of the Supreme Court of the Province of Alberta[1], reversing the judgment of Beck J., at the trial[2], and dismissing the plaintiff's (appellant's) action with costs.
On the appeal by the plaintiff, the Supreme Court of Canada, after hearing counsel on behalf of both parties, reserved judgment and, on a subsequent day, the appeal was allowed and the judgment of the trial judge was restored, with costs in the Supreme Court of Canada and in the court appealed from.
Appeal allowed with costs.
C. A. Grant for the appellant.
Wallace Nesbitt K.C. for the respondents.
[1] 3 Alta. L.R. 108.
[2] 2 Alta. L.R. 442.

Source: decisions.scc-csc.ca

Related cases