Sherman v. Merck & Co. Inc.
Source text
Sherman v. Merck & Co. Inc. Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2007-04-26 Neutral citation 2007 FCA 166 File numbers A-318-06 Decision Content Date: 20070426 Docket: A-318-06 Citation: 2007 FCA 166 CORAM: SEXTON J.A. MALONE J.A. RYER J.A. BETWEEN: BERNARD SHERMAN Appellant and MERCK & CO., INC. and MERCK FROSST CANADA & CO. Respondents Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on April 26, 2007. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on April 26, 2007. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: MALONE J.A. Date: 20070426 Docket: A-318-06 Citation: 2007 FCA 166 CORAM: SEXTON J.A. MALONE J.A. RYER J.A. BETWEEN: BERNARD SHERMAN Appellant and MERCK & CO., INC. and MERCK FROSST CANADA & CO. Respondents REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on April 26, 2007) MALONE J.A. [1] We have not been persuaded that either the Application Judge or the Prothonotary committed any material errors of fact or law that would warrant the intervention of this Court. [2] The respondents are entitled to their costs on appeal. “B. Malone” J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-318-06 APPEAL FROM THE JUDGMENT OF THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE LEMIEUX DATED 6-JUL-2006 (FILE T-753-99) STYLE OF CAUSE: BERNARD SHERMAN v. MERCK & CO., INC. and MERCK FROSST CANADA & CO. PLACE OF HEARING: TORONTO, ONTARIO DATE OF HEARING: APRIL 26, 2007 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: (SEXTON, MALONE & RYER JJ.A.) DELIVERED…
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Sherman v. Merck & Co. Inc. Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2007-04-26 Neutral citation 2007 FCA 166 File numbers A-318-06 Decision Content Date: 20070426 Docket: A-318-06 Citation: 2007 FCA 166 CORAM: SEXTON J.A. MALONE J.A. RYER J.A. BETWEEN: BERNARD SHERMAN Appellant and MERCK & CO., INC. and MERCK FROSST CANADA & CO. Respondents Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on April 26, 2007. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on April 26, 2007. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: MALONE J.A. Date: 20070426 Docket: A-318-06 Citation: 2007 FCA 166 CORAM: SEXTON J.A. MALONE J.A. RYER J.A. BETWEEN: BERNARD SHERMAN Appellant and MERCK & CO., INC. and MERCK FROSST CANADA & CO. Respondents REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on April 26, 2007) MALONE J.A. [1] We have not been persuaded that either the Application Judge or the Prothonotary committed any material errors of fact or law that would warrant the intervention of this Court. [2] The respondents are entitled to their costs on appeal. “B. Malone” J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-318-06 APPEAL FROM THE JUDGMENT OF THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE LEMIEUX DATED 6-JUL-2006 (FILE T-753-99) STYLE OF CAUSE: BERNARD SHERMAN v. MERCK & CO., INC. and MERCK FROSST CANADA & CO. PLACE OF HEARING: TORONTO, ONTARIO DATE OF HEARING: APRIL 26, 2007 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: (SEXTON, MALONE & RYER JJ.A.) DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: MALONE J.A. APPEARANCES: MS.ANDREA L.BURKE FOR THE APPELLANT MR.FRANK MCLAUGHLIN MS.MEIGHAN LEON FOR THE RESPONDENTS SOLICITORS OF RECORD: DAVIES WARD PHILLIPS & VINEBERG LLP TORONTO, ONTARIO FOR THE APPELLANT MCCARTHY TÉTRAULT LLP TORONTO, ONTARIO FOR THE RESPONDENTS
Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca
Administration des aéroports régionaux d’Edmonton c. Thibodeau
2024 CAF 196