Arora v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
Source text
Arora v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2009-11-04 Neutral citation 2009 FC 1123 File numbers IMM-1290-09 Decision Content Federal Court Cour fédérale Date: 20091104 Docket: IMM-1290-09 Citation: 2009 FC 1123 Ottawa, Ontario, November 4, 2009 PRESENT: The Honourable Madam Justice Snider BETWEEN: RAMESH ARORA Applicant and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent SUPPLEMENTAL REASONS FOR JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT [1] In my Reasons for Judgment and Judgment rendered on October 13, 2009 in this case, I allowed either party to propose a question for certification and to respond to any question proposed. [2] Neither party proposes a question for certification. JUDGMENT THIS COURT ORDERS AND ADJUDGES that 1. No question of general importance is certified. “Judith A. Snider” Judge FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: IMM-1290-09 STYLE OF CAUSE: RAMESH ARORA v. THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION PLACE OF HEARING: Toronto, Ontario DATE OF HEARING: September 30, 2009 SUPPLEMENTAL REASONS FOR JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT: Snider, J. DATED: November 4, 2009 APPEARANCES: Ms. Ladan Shahrooz FOR THE APPLICANT Mr. Dov Maierovitz FOR THE RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Gertler, Etienne LLP Barristers and Solicitors Toronto, Ontario FOR THE APPLICANT John H. Sims, Q.C. Deputy Attorney General of Canada Toronto, Ontario FOR THE RESPONDENT …
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Arora v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2009-11-04 Neutral citation 2009 FC 1123 File numbers IMM-1290-09 Decision Content Federal Court Cour fédérale Date: 20091104 Docket: IMM-1290-09 Citation: 2009 FC 1123 Ottawa, Ontario, November 4, 2009 PRESENT: The Honourable Madam Justice Snider BETWEEN: RAMESH ARORA Applicant and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent SUPPLEMENTAL REASONS FOR JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT [1] In my Reasons for Judgment and Judgment rendered on October 13, 2009 in this case, I allowed either party to propose a question for certification and to respond to any question proposed. [2] Neither party proposes a question for certification. JUDGMENT THIS COURT ORDERS AND ADJUDGES that 1. No question of general importance is certified. “Judith A. Snider” Judge FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: IMM-1290-09 STYLE OF CAUSE: RAMESH ARORA v. THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION PLACE OF HEARING: Toronto, Ontario DATE OF HEARING: September 30, 2009 SUPPLEMENTAL REASONS FOR JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT: Snider, J. DATED: November 4, 2009 APPEARANCES: Ms. Ladan Shahrooz FOR THE APPLICANT Mr. Dov Maierovitz FOR THE RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Gertler, Etienne LLP Barristers and Solicitors Toronto, Ontario FOR THE APPLICANT John H. Sims, Q.C. Deputy Attorney General of Canada Toronto, Ontario FOR THE RESPONDENT
Source: decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca
Démocratie en surveillance c. Canada (Procureur général)
2024 CAF 158