Rockwood park Inc. v. Emera Brunswick Pipeline Company Ltd.
Source text
Rockwood park Inc. v. Emera Brunswick Pipeline Company Ltd. Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2007-09-20 Neutral citation 2007 FCA 300 File numbers 07-A-26 Decision Content Date: 20070920 Docket: 07-A-26 Citation: 2007 FCA 300 CORAM: NOËL J.A. SHARLOW J.A. PELLETIER J.A. BETWEEN: FRIENDS OF ROCKWOOD PARK INC. Applicant and EMERA INC. and THE EMERA BRUNSWICK PIPELINE COMPANY LTD. Respondents Heard at Ottawa, Ontario, on September 20, 2007. Order delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on September 20, 2007. REASONS FOR ORDER OF THE COURT BY: NOËL J.A. Date: 20070920 Docket: 07-A-26 Citation: 2007 FCA 300 CORAM: NOËL J.A. SHARLOW J.A. PELLETIER J.A. BETWEEN: FRIENDS OF ROCKWOOD PARK INC. Applicant and EMERA INC. and THE EMERA BRUNSWICK PIPELINE COMPANY LTD. Respondents REASONS FOR ORDER OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on September 20, 2007.) NOËL J.A. [1] Having considered the written and oral submissions of the Applicant, we have not been persuaded that their proposed appeal raises an arguable question of law and jurisdiction with the meaning of section 22 of the National Energy Board Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. N-7. [2] Leave to appeal will therefore be dismissed with costs. An order is issued accordingly. “Marc Noël” J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: 07-A-26 STYLE OF CAUSE: FRIENDS OF ROCKWOOD PARK INC. and EMERA INC. and THE EMERA BRUNSWICK PIPELINE COMPANY LTD. PLACE OF HEARING: O…
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Rockwood park Inc. v. Emera Brunswick Pipeline Company Ltd. Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2007-09-20 Neutral citation 2007 FCA 300 File numbers 07-A-26 Decision Content Date: 20070920 Docket: 07-A-26 Citation: 2007 FCA 300 CORAM: NOËL J.A. SHARLOW J.A. PELLETIER J.A. BETWEEN: FRIENDS OF ROCKWOOD PARK INC. Applicant and EMERA INC. and THE EMERA BRUNSWICK PIPELINE COMPANY LTD. Respondents Heard at Ottawa, Ontario, on September 20, 2007. Order delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on September 20, 2007. REASONS FOR ORDER OF THE COURT BY: NOËL J.A. Date: 20070920 Docket: 07-A-26 Citation: 2007 FCA 300 CORAM: NOËL J.A. SHARLOW J.A. PELLETIER J.A. BETWEEN: FRIENDS OF ROCKWOOD PARK INC. Applicant and EMERA INC. and THE EMERA BRUNSWICK PIPELINE COMPANY LTD. Respondents REASONS FOR ORDER OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on September 20, 2007.) NOËL J.A. [1] Having considered the written and oral submissions of the Applicant, we have not been persuaded that their proposed appeal raises an arguable question of law and jurisdiction with the meaning of section 22 of the National Energy Board Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. N-7. [2] Leave to appeal will therefore be dismissed with costs. An order is issued accordingly. “Marc Noël” J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: 07-A-26 STYLE OF CAUSE: FRIENDS OF ROCKWOOD PARK INC. and EMERA INC. and THE EMERA BRUNSWICK PIPELINE COMPANY LTD. PLACE OF HEARING: Ottawa, Ontario DATE OF HEARING: September 20, 2007 REASONS FOR ORDER OF THE COURT BY: NOËL J.A. SHARLOW J.A. PELLETIER J.A. DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: NOËL J.A. APPEARANCES: Ms. Lara Tessaro FOR THE APPLICANT Mr. E. Bruce Mellett Mr. Lawrence E. Smith Q.C. Mr. Peter C.P. Thompson, Q.C. Ms. Krsten Crain Mr. Jake Harms FOR THE RESPONDENT Emera Inc., The Emera Brunswick Pipeline Company Ltd. FOR THE RESPONDENT Repsol Energy Canada Ltd FOR THE RESPONDENT The Attorney General of Canada SOLICITORS OF RECORD: LARA TESSARO Vancouver, B.C. FOR THE APPLICANT BENNETT JONES LLP Calgary, Alberta Mr. Peter C.P. Thompson, Q.C. Ms. Krsten Crain JOHN H. SMITH Q.C. DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA FOR THE RESPONDENT Emera Inc., The Emera Brunswick Pipeline Company Ltd. FOR THE RESPONDENT Repsol Energy Canada Ltd FOR THE RESPONDENT The Attorney General of Canada
Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca
Administration des aéroports régionaux d’Edmonton c. Thibodeau
2024 CAF 196