Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. County of Halton
Court headnote
Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. County of Halton Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1893-02-20 Report (1893) 21 SCR 716 Judges Strong, Samuel Henry; Fournier, Télesphore; Taschereau, Henri-Elzéar; Gwynne, John Wellington; Patterson, Christopher Salmon On appeal from Ontario Subjects Transportation Decision Content Supreme Court of Canada Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. County of Halton, (1893) 21 S.C.R. 716 Date: 1893-02-20 Grand Trunk Railway Co. and County of Halton 1892: November 8, 9; 1893: February 20. Present: Strong C.J. and Fournier, Taschereau, Gwynne and Patterson JJ. Railway Co.—Bonus—Bond—Condition—Breach. APPEAL from a decision of the Court of Appeal for Ontario[1] affirming the judgment of the Divisional Court in favour of the plaintiffs. The action was brought by the County of Halton to recover a bonus paid to the Hamilton and North-Western Railway Co. in aid of their road, the company having executed a bond in favour of the county one of the conditions of which was that the bonus should be repaid “in the event of the company, during the period of twenty-one years, ceasing to be an independent company.” Four years after the company became merged in the Grand Trunk system, and on the trial it was held that it had ceased thereby to be an independent line. Judgment was accordingly given in favour of the county which was affirmed by the Divisional Court and the Court of Appeal. The Supreme Court affirmed this decision for the reasons given in the Court of Appeal, and he…
Read full judgment
Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. County of Halton Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1893-02-20 Report (1893) 21 SCR 716 Judges Strong, Samuel Henry; Fournier, Télesphore; Taschereau, Henri-Elzéar; Gwynne, John Wellington; Patterson, Christopher Salmon On appeal from Ontario Subjects Transportation Decision Content Supreme Court of Canada Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. County of Halton, (1893) 21 S.C.R. 716 Date: 1893-02-20 Grand Trunk Railway Co. and County of Halton 1892: November 8, 9; 1893: February 20. Present: Strong C.J. and Fournier, Taschereau, Gwynne and Patterson JJ. Railway Co.—Bonus—Bond—Condition—Breach. APPEAL from a decision of the Court of Appeal for Ontario[1] affirming the judgment of the Divisional Court in favour of the plaintiffs. The action was brought by the County of Halton to recover a bonus paid to the Hamilton and North-Western Railway Co. in aid of their road, the company having executed a bond in favour of the county one of the conditions of which was that the bonus should be repaid “in the event of the company, during the period of twenty-one years, ceasing to be an independent company.” Four years after the company became merged in the Grand Trunk system, and on the trial it was held that it had ceased thereby to be an independent line. Judgment was accordingly given in favour of the county which was affirmed by the Divisional Court and the Court of Appeal. The Supreme Court affirmed this decision for the reasons given in the Court of Appeal, and held that the county was entitled to recover the whole amount of the bonus as unliquidated damages under the bond. S.H. Blake Q.C. and W. Cassels Q.C. for the appellants. Robinson Q.C. and Bain Q.C. for the respondents. [1] 19 Ont. App. R. 252.
Source: decisions.scc-csc.ca