Skip to main content
Federal Court of Appeal· 2002

Marcoux v. Canada (Attorney General)

2002 FCA 15
Quebec civil lawJD
Cite or share
Share via WhatsAppEmail
Showing the official court-reporter headnote. An editorial brief (facts · issues · held · ratio · significance) is on the roadmap for this case. The judgment text below is the authoritative source.

Court headnote

Marcoux v. Canada (Attorney General) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2002-01-15 Neutral citation 2002 FCA 15 File numbers A-816-99 Decision Content Date: 20020115 Docket: A-816-99 Citation: 2002 FCA 15 BETWEEN: YVETTE MARCOUX Appellant - and - ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS FRANÇOIS PILON Assessment Officer [1] This is an appeal from a Trial Division judgment which was dismissed with costs on April 2, 2001. [2] Patrick Vézina, counsel for the defendant, filed his bill of costs on July 13, 2001 and asked that it be assessed without a personal appearance by the parties. As no written submissions have been received within the specified deadlines, we will proceed to assess the defendant's bill. [3] As fees counsel for the defendant claimed the following items: item 19 5 units item 22(a) 2 units item 25 1 unit item 26 4 units These claims seem reasonable in the circumstances and will be awarded. However, Mr. Vézina based the value of each unit on setting out the new value of the Tariff in effect on April 1, 2001. Consequently, the total amount of the services to be assessed will increase from $1,450 to $1,595. [4] The amount of $1,025.33 is awarded for disbursements to be assessed. [5] The defendant's costs are assessed and allowed in the amount of $2,620.33. A certificate will be issued for that amount. Halifax, Nova Scotia January 15, 2001 (signed) François Pilon Assessment Officer Certified true translation Suzanne …

Read full judgment
Marcoux v. Canada (Attorney General)
Court (s) Database
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date
2002-01-15
Neutral citation
2002 FCA 15
File numbers
A-816-99
Decision Content
Date: 20020115
Docket: A-816-99
Citation: 2002 FCA 15
BETWEEN:
YVETTE MARCOUX
Appellant
- and -
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
Respondent
ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS
FRANÇOIS PILON
Assessment Officer
[1] This is an appeal from a Trial Division judgment which was dismissed with costs on April 2, 2001.
[2] Patrick Vézina, counsel for the defendant, filed his bill of costs on July 13, 2001 and asked that it be assessed without a personal appearance by the parties. As no written submissions have been received within the specified deadlines, we will proceed to assess the defendant's bill.
[3] As fees counsel for the defendant claimed the following items:
item 19 5 units
item 22(a) 2 units
item 25 1 unit
item 26 4 units
These claims seem reasonable in the circumstances and will be awarded. However, Mr. Vézina based the value of each unit on setting out the new value of the Tariff in effect on April 1, 2001. Consequently, the total amount of the services to be assessed will increase from $1,450 to $1,595.
[4] The amount of $1,025.33 is awarded for disbursements to be assessed.
[5] The defendant's costs are assessed and allowed in the amount of $2,620.33. A certificate will be issued for that amount.
Halifax, Nova Scotia
January 15, 2001
(signed)
François Pilon
Assessment Officer
Certified true translation
Suzanne M. Gauthier, LL.L. Trad. a.
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
COURT FILE No.: A-816-99
BETWEEN: YVETTE MARCOUX
Appellant
- and -
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
Respondent
ASSESSMENT IN WRITING WITHOUT PERSONAL APPEARANCE
REASONS BY: François Pilon, Assessment Officer
PLACE OF ASSESSMENT: Halifax, Nova Scotia
DATE OF REASONS: January 15, 2002
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Pothier, Delisle FOR THE PLAINTIFF
Sainte-Foy, Quebec
Morris Rosenberg FOR THE DEFENDANT
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
Ottawa, Ontario

Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca

Related cases