Skip to main content
Federal Court· 2001

Société des Loteries du Québec v. Club Lotto International Cli Inc.

2001 FCT 593
Quebec civil lawJD
Cite or share
Share via WhatsAppEmail
Showing the official court-reporter headnote. An editorial brief (facts · issues · held · ratio · significance) is on the roadmap for this case. The judgment text below is the authoritative source.

Court headnote

Société des Loteries du Québec v. Club Lotto International Cli Inc. Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2001-06-06 Neutral citation 2001 FCT 593 File numbers T-305-98 Decision Content Date: 20010606 Docket: T-305-98 Neutral citation: 2001 FCT 593 Between: SOCIÉTÉDES LOTERIES DU QUÉBEC Plaintiff AND CLUB LOTTO INTERNATIONAL C.L.I. INC. Defendant ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS MICHELLE LAMY, ASSESSMENT OFFICER [1] On January 25, 2001, the Court allowed this action and ordered the defendant to pay costs. The assessment of the plaintiff's costs took place on May 24, 2001, with Léanne Souquet in attendance. The defendant was not present despite having been duly served. [2] The evidence submitted by the plaintiff in support of its bill of costs having been reviewed, all disbursements and counsel fees are allowed as submitted, except for those claimed for the preparation of written argument in response to the notice of status review, since Ms. Souquet was unable to refer me to any specific item in Tarif B to justify her claim. I told Ms. Souquet that the units for assessment of costs would be reduced since this proceeding was not contested. I will therefore allow 3 units under item 26. [3] The plaintiff's costs are therefore assessed at $13,553.02. A certificate will issue for that amount. Michelle Lamy MICHELLE LAMY TAXATION OFFICER MONTRÉAL, QUEBEC June 6, 2001 Certified true translation Sophie Debbané, LL.B. FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA TRIAL DIVISION NAMES OF COUNSEL AND S…

Read full judgment
Société des Loteries du Québec v. Club Lotto International Cli Inc.
Court (s) Database
Federal Court Decisions
Date
2001-06-06
Neutral citation
2001 FCT 593
File numbers
T-305-98
Decision Content
Date: 20010606
Docket: T-305-98
Neutral citation: 2001 FCT 593
Between:
SOCIÉTÉDES LOTERIES DU QUÉBEC
Plaintiff
AND
CLUB LOTTO INTERNATIONAL C.L.I. INC.
Defendant
ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS
MICHELLE LAMY, ASSESSMENT OFFICER
[1] On January 25, 2001, the Court allowed this action and ordered the defendant to pay costs. The assessment of the plaintiff's costs took place on May 24, 2001, with Léanne Souquet in attendance. The defendant was not present despite having been duly served.
[2] The evidence submitted by the plaintiff in support of its bill of costs having been reviewed, all disbursements and counsel fees are allowed as submitted, except for those claimed for the preparation of written argument in response to the notice of status review, since Ms. Souquet was unable to refer me to any specific item in Tarif B to justify her claim. I told Ms. Souquet that the units for assessment of costs would be reduced since this proceeding was not contested. I will therefore allow 3 units under item 26.
[3] The plaintiff's costs are therefore assessed at $13,553.02. A certificate will issue for that amount.
Michelle Lamy
MICHELLE LAMY
TAXATION OFFICER
MONTRÉAL, QUEBEC
June 6, 2001
Certified true translation
Sophie Debbané, LL.B.
FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA
TRIAL DIVISION
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
COURT FILE NO.: T-305-98
Between:
SOCIÉTÉDES LOTERIES DU QUÉBEC
Plaintiff
AND
CLUB LOTTO INTERNATIONAL C.L.I. INC.
Defendant
PLACE OF ASSESSMENT: Montréal, Quebec
DATE OF ASSESSMENT: May 24, 2001
REASONS OF MICHELLE LAMY, ASSESSMENT OFFICER
DATE OF REASONS: June 6, 2001
APPEARANCE: Léanne Souquet for the Plaintiff
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Ogilvy Renault
Montréal, Quebec For the Plaintiff
Bussières, Boulanger, Racine & Langevin
Sainte-Foy, Quebec For the Defendant
FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA
TRIAL DIVISION
Date: 20010606
Docket: T-305-98
BETWEEN:
SOCIÉTÉDES LOTERIES DU QUÉBEC
Plaintiff
AND
CLUB LOTTO INTERNATIONAL C.L.I. INC.
Defendant
ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS

Source: decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca

Related cases