Molenaar v. Canada
Court headnote
Molenaar v. Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2005-11-14 Neutral citation 2005 FCA 380 File numbers A-315-03 Decision Content Date: 20051114 Docket: A-315-03 Citation: 2005 FCA 380 Between: JOHN MOLENAAR Appellant AND HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent ASSESSMENT OF COSTS – REASONS MICHELLE LAMY, ASSESSMENT OFFICER [1] This is an assessment of costs following the judgment delivered on October 18, 2004, dismissing the appeal. On August 16, 2005, we sent by registered mail a copy of the respondent’s bill of costs, along with a letter directing the appellant to file his submissions in writing by September 16, 2005. Having received no response to date from the appellant, I am ready to assess the costs on the basis of the proceedings on record. [2] In light of the foregoing, fees in the amount of $1,300.08 are allowed for items 19 ($600), 22(a) ($340.08), 25 ($120) and 26 ($240) of Tariff B. I have adjusted the amount allowed under item 26 for the assessment of costs, as this proceeding was not contested. [3] Photocopying, transcription and service costs in this appeal are allowed as requested in the amount of $590.64. [4] The respondent’s costs are accordingly assessed and allowed in the amount of $1,890.72. A certificate is issued for that amount. DATED AT MONTRÉAL, THE 14TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2005. Signed: “Michelle Lamy” Assessment Officer Certified true translation Michael Palles FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-315-03 STYLE OF…
Read full judgment
Molenaar v. Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2005-11-14 Neutral citation 2005 FCA 380 File numbers A-315-03 Decision Content Date: 20051114 Docket: A-315-03 Citation: 2005 FCA 380 Between: JOHN MOLENAAR Appellant AND HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent ASSESSMENT OF COSTS – REASONS MICHELLE LAMY, ASSESSMENT OFFICER [1] This is an assessment of costs following the judgment delivered on October 18, 2004, dismissing the appeal. On August 16, 2005, we sent by registered mail a copy of the respondent’s bill of costs, along with a letter directing the appellant to file his submissions in writing by September 16, 2005. Having received no response to date from the appellant, I am ready to assess the costs on the basis of the proceedings on record. [2] In light of the foregoing, fees in the amount of $1,300.08 are allowed for items 19 ($600), 22(a) ($340.08), 25 ($120) and 26 ($240) of Tariff B. I have adjusted the amount allowed under item 26 for the assessment of costs, as this proceeding was not contested. [3] Photocopying, transcription and service costs in this appeal are allowed as requested in the amount of $590.64. [4] The respondent’s costs are accordingly assessed and allowed in the amount of $1,890.72. A certificate is issued for that amount. DATED AT MONTRÉAL, THE 14TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2005. Signed: “Michelle Lamy” Assessment Officer Certified true translation Michael Palles FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-315-03 STYLE OF CAUSE: JOHN MOLENAAR v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN ASSESSMENT OF COSTS IN WRITING PLACE OF ASSESSMENT: Montréal, Quebec REASONS BY: Assessment Officer Michelle Lamy DATED: November 14, 2005 SOLICITORS OF RECORD: JOHN SIMS FOR THE RESPONDENT Deputy Attorney General of Canada Ottawa, Ontario
Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca