Grenier v. Canada
Source text
Grenier v. Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2006-04-10 Neutral citation 2006 FCA 140 File numbers A-597-02 Decision Content Date: 20060410 Docket: A-597-02 Citation: 2006 FCA 140 BETWEEN: RAYNALD GRENIER Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent ASSESSMENT OF COSTS -- REASONS DIANE PERRIER, ASSESSMENT OFFICER [1] On April 1, 2004, the Federal Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal with costs from a decision by the Tax Court of Canada regarding reassessments by the Minister of National Revenue for the taxation years 1993 to 1996 inclusive. [2] On July 27, 2005, the respondent filed her bill of costs and asked that it be assessed without personal appearance of the parties. On August 29, 2005, we sent letters to the parties setting out a schedule for filing their submissions. We received a phone call from Mrs. Grenier, Mr. Grenier’s spouse, informing us that he was in the hospital and therefore unable to respond to his bill of costs. Subsequently, we contacted Mr. Grenier, who informed us that he was available to challenge the bill of costs. On December 5, 2005, we once again sent letters to the parties setting out a new schedule. No written submission have been filed to date and I will now proceed with the assessment of costs in accordance with the documentation of record. [3] The fees claimed are awarded with the exception of item 26. Item 26 is reduced to 2 units since the assessment of costs was not challenged. [4] All disbursements are awa…
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Grenier v. Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2006-04-10 Neutral citation 2006 FCA 140 File numbers A-597-02 Decision Content Date: 20060410 Docket: A-597-02 Citation: 2006 FCA 140 BETWEEN: RAYNALD GRENIER Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent ASSESSMENT OF COSTS -- REASONS DIANE PERRIER, ASSESSMENT OFFICER [1] On April 1, 2004, the Federal Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal with costs from a decision by the Tax Court of Canada regarding reassessments by the Minister of National Revenue for the taxation years 1993 to 1996 inclusive. [2] On July 27, 2005, the respondent filed her bill of costs and asked that it be assessed without personal appearance of the parties. On August 29, 2005, we sent letters to the parties setting out a schedule for filing their submissions. We received a phone call from Mrs. Grenier, Mr. Grenier’s spouse, informing us that he was in the hospital and therefore unable to respond to his bill of costs. Subsequently, we contacted Mr. Grenier, who informed us that he was available to challenge the bill of costs. On December 5, 2005, we once again sent letters to the parties setting out a new schedule. No written submission have been filed to date and I will now proceed with the assessment of costs in accordance with the documentation of record. [3] The fees claimed are awarded with the exception of item 26. Item 26 is reduced to 2 units since the assessment of costs was not challenged. [4] All disbursements are awarded with the exception of the service of the Notice of Appearance in the amount of $64.10 because the Notice of Appearance is not an assessable service under Tariff B. [5] The bill of costs is therefore assessed and allowed in the amount of $3,142.21. An assessment certificate will be issued for that amount. ______________________________ DIANE PERRIER ASSESSMENT OFFICER QUÉBEC, QUEBEC le 10 avril 2006 Certified true translation François Brunet, LLB, BCL FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-597-02 STYLE OF CAUSE: RAYNALD GRENIER v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN WRITTEN ASSESSMENT OF COSTS REASONS FOR ASSESSMENT OF COSTS BY: DIANE PERRIER DATED: April 10, 2006 SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Department of Justice, Canada Montréal, Quebec FOR THE RESPONDENT
Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca
Quebec (Attorney General) v A
[2013] 1 SCR 61