Jaguar Cars Limited v. Remo Imports Ltd.
Court headnote
Jaguar Cars Limited v. Remo Imports Ltd. Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2007-03-15 Neutral citation 2007 FCA 122 File numbers A-270-06 Decision Content Date: 20070315 Docket: A-270-06 Citation: 2007 FCA 122 CORAM: NADON J.A. SHARLOW J.A. MALONE J.A. BETWEEN: JAGUAR CARS LIMITED and FORD MOTOR COMPANY OF CANADA, LIMITED/ FORD DU CANADA LIMITEE carrying on business as JAGUAR CANADA Appellants (Defendants) and REMO IMPORTS LTD. Respondent (Plaintiff) Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on March 15, 2007. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on March 15, 2007. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: SHARLOW J.A. Date: 20070315 Docket: A-270-06 Citation: 2007 FCA 122 CORAM: NADON J.A. SHARLOW J.A. MALONE J.A. BETWEEN: JAGUAR CARS LIMITED and FORD MOTOR COMPANY OF CANADA, LIMITED/ FORD DU CANADA LIMITEE carrying on business as JAGUAR CANADA Appellants (Defendants) and REMO IMPORTS LTD. Respondent (Plaintiff) REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on March 15, 2007) SHARLOW J.A. [1] We are all of the view that this appeal should be allowed on the basis that the Judge erred in his application of Rule 420 (2006 FC 690). [2] At the commencement of trial, the settlement offer made by the Appellants on May 6, 1997 had not been expressly withdrawn or revoked. Nor did the subsequent settlement discussions yield a new offer that could reasonably be construed as an implicit revocation. The record discloses no basis f…
Read full judgment
Jaguar Cars Limited v. Remo Imports Ltd. Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2007-03-15 Neutral citation 2007 FCA 122 File numbers A-270-06 Decision Content Date: 20070315 Docket: A-270-06 Citation: 2007 FCA 122 CORAM: NADON J.A. SHARLOW J.A. MALONE J.A. BETWEEN: JAGUAR CARS LIMITED and FORD MOTOR COMPANY OF CANADA, LIMITED/ FORD DU CANADA LIMITEE carrying on business as JAGUAR CANADA Appellants (Defendants) and REMO IMPORTS LTD. Respondent (Plaintiff) Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on March 15, 2007. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on March 15, 2007. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: SHARLOW J.A. Date: 20070315 Docket: A-270-06 Citation: 2007 FCA 122 CORAM: NADON J.A. SHARLOW J.A. MALONE J.A. BETWEEN: JAGUAR CARS LIMITED and FORD MOTOR COMPANY OF CANADA, LIMITED/ FORD DU CANADA LIMITEE carrying on business as JAGUAR CANADA Appellants (Defendants) and REMO IMPORTS LTD. Respondent (Plaintiff) REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on March 15, 2007) SHARLOW J.A. [1] We are all of the view that this appeal should be allowed on the basis that the Judge erred in his application of Rule 420 (2006 FC 690). [2] At the commencement of trial, the settlement offer made by the Appellants on May 6, 1997 had not been expressly withdrawn or revoked. Nor did the subsequent settlement discussions yield a new offer that could reasonably be construed as an implicit revocation. The record discloses no basis for not giving the Appellant’s double costs after May 6, 1997. [3] For these reasons, we would allow this appeal and vary paragraph (f) of the order under appeal so that it reads: “The Defendant’s offer of May 6, 1997 will double the costs, excluding disbursements, after that date.” [4] The Appellants are entitled to their costs fixed at $2,000.00. “K. Sharlow” J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-270-06 STYLE OF CAUSE: JAGUAR CARS LIMITED and FORD MOTOR COMPANY OF CANADA, LIMITED/ FORD DU CANADA LIMITEE carrying on business as JAGUAR CANADA Appellants (Defendants) and REMO IMPORTS LTD. Respondent (Plaintiff) PLACE OF HEARING: TORONTO, ONTARIO DATE OF HEARING: March 15, 2007 REASONS FOR OF THE COURT BY: (NADON, SHARLOW & MALONE JJ.A.) DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: SHARLOW J.A. APPEARANCES: J. Douglas Wilson Pauline Bosman FOR THE APPELLANTS Richard Uditski FOR THE RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Ridout & Maybee FOR THE APPELLANT Barristers & Solicitors Toronto, Ontario McMillan Binch Mendelsohn Barristers & Solicitors FOR THE RESPONDENTS
Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca