Skip to main content
Federal Court of Appeal· 2007Unreviewed source text

Murray v. Canada

2007 FCA 158
GeneralJD
Cite or share
Share via WhatsAppEmail
Showing unreviewed source text. Provenance under review — verify against the linked original before relying on it.

Source text

Murray v. Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2007-04-19 Neutral citation 2007 FCA 158 File numbers A-299-06 Decision Content Date: 20070419 Docket: A-299-06 Citation: 2007 FCA 158 CORAM: SEXTON J.A. PELLETIER J.A. MALONE J.A. BETWEEN: ELLSWORTH MURRAY Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN in Right of Canada as Represented by the ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent Heard at Ottawa, Ontario, on April 18, 2007 Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on April 19, 2007 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: MALONE J.A. CONCURRED IN BY: . SEXTON J.A. PELLETIER J.A. Date: 20070419 Docket: A-299-06 Citation: 2007 FCA 158 CORAM: SEXTON J.A. PELLETIER J.A. MALONE J.A. BETWEEN: ELLSWORTH MURRAY Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN in Right of Canada as Represented by the ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT MALONE J.A. [1] The appellant appeals a judgment of the Tax Court of Canada dated June 7, 2006. That judgment confirmed, with minor adjustments for motor vehicle expenses, the reassessments of the Minister of National Revenue for the appellant’s taxation years 2000 and 2001. [2] These reassessments related to certain claimed expenses for rent, travel, lodging, car rentals and group insurance. Despite the detailed arguments of the appellant, I am not persuaded that the Tax Court Judge committed any errors that warrant our intervention. [3] The appeal should be dismissed with costs (1 counsel fee only). "B. Malone" J.A. "I agree J. Edgar Sexton J.A."…

Read full judgment (source text)

Mirrored from decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.

Murray v. Canada
Court (s) Database
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date
2007-04-19
Neutral citation
2007 FCA 158
File numbers
A-299-06
Decision Content
Date: 20070419
Docket: A-299-06
Citation: 2007 FCA 158
CORAM: SEXTON J.A.
PELLETIER J.A.
MALONE J.A.
BETWEEN:
ELLSWORTH MURRAY
Appellant
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN in Right of Canada
as Represented by the ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
Respondent
Heard at Ottawa, Ontario, on April 18, 2007
Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on April 19, 2007
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: MALONE J.A.
CONCURRED IN BY: . SEXTON J.A.
PELLETIER J.A.
Date: 20070419
Docket: A-299-06
Citation: 2007 FCA 158
CORAM: SEXTON J.A.
PELLETIER J.A.
MALONE J.A.
BETWEEN:
ELLSWORTH MURRAY
Appellant
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN in Right of Canada
as Represented by the ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
MALONE J.A.
[1] The appellant appeals a judgment of the Tax Court of Canada dated June 7, 2006. That judgment confirmed, with minor adjustments for motor vehicle expenses, the reassessments of the Minister of National Revenue for the appellant’s taxation years 2000 and 2001.
[2] These reassessments related to certain claimed expenses for rent, travel, lodging, car rentals and group insurance. Despite the detailed arguments of the appellant, I am not persuaded that the Tax Court Judge committed any errors that warrant our intervention.
[3] The appeal should be dismissed with costs (1 counsel fee only).
"B. Malone"
J.A.
"I agree
J. Edgar Sexton J.A."
"I agree
J.D. Denis Pelletier"
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: A-299-06
Appeal from an Order of the Tax Court of Canada dated June 7, 2006
STYLE OF CAUSE: ELLSWORTH MURRAY
v.
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN in
Right of Canada as Represented by the
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
PLACE OF HEARING: OTTAWA
DATE OF HEARING: APRIL 18, 2007
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT: MALONE J.A.
CONCURRED IN BY: SEXTON J.A
PELLETIER J.A.
DATED: APRIL 19, 2007
APPEARANCES:
Ellsworth Murray
ON HIS OWN BEHALF
André LeBlanc
Geneviève Léveillé
FOR THE RESPONDENT
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Ellsworth Murray
ON HIS OWN BEHALF
John H. Sims, Q.C.
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
FOR THE RESPONDENT

Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca

Related cases