Transport Robert (1973) Ltée v. Canada
Source text
Transport Robert (1973) Ltée v. Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2010-07-12 Neutral citation 2010 FCA 186 File numbers A-240-09 Decision Content Federal Court of Appeal CANADA Cour d’appel fédérale Date: 20100712 Docket: A-240-09 Citation: 2010 FCA 186 [ENGLISH TRANSLATION] BETWEEN: TRANSPORT ROBERT (1973) LTÉE Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent ASSESSMENT OF COSTS – REASONS DIANE PERRIER, ASSESSMENT OFFICER [1] This is an assessment of respondent’s bill of costs following the Federal Court of Appeal’s decision on January 27, 2017, which rendered the following judgment: “The appeal is dismissed”. It should be noted that there is no mention of costs. Under Rule 105 of the Federal Courts Rules, the Federal Court has the discretionary power to consolidate two proceedings. As assessment officers are defined in Rule 2 of the Federal Courts Rules as: “an officer of the Registry designated by an order of the Court”, they therefore cannot assess the costs because there is no Court judgment allowing them to do so. [2] Although the respondent filed a bill of costs on May 10, 2010, and a direction was sent to the parties setting a deadline for filing written representations, I cannot assess the costs because the Court made no mention of costs in its judgment. MONTRÉAL, QUEBEC July 12, 2010 “Diane Perrier” DIANE PERRIER ASSESSMENT OFFICER FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-240-09 STYLE OF CAUSE: TRANSPOR…
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Transport Robert (1973) Ltée v. Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2010-07-12 Neutral citation 2010 FCA 186 File numbers A-240-09 Decision Content Federal Court of Appeal CANADA Cour d’appel fédérale Date: 20100712 Docket: A-240-09 Citation: 2010 FCA 186 [ENGLISH TRANSLATION] BETWEEN: TRANSPORT ROBERT (1973) LTÉE Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent ASSESSMENT OF COSTS – REASONS DIANE PERRIER, ASSESSMENT OFFICER [1] This is an assessment of respondent’s bill of costs following the Federal Court of Appeal’s decision on January 27, 2017, which rendered the following judgment: “The appeal is dismissed”. It should be noted that there is no mention of costs. Under Rule 105 of the Federal Courts Rules, the Federal Court has the discretionary power to consolidate two proceedings. As assessment officers are defined in Rule 2 of the Federal Courts Rules as: “an officer of the Registry designated by an order of the Court”, they therefore cannot assess the costs because there is no Court judgment allowing them to do so. [2] Although the respondent filed a bill of costs on May 10, 2010, and a direction was sent to the parties setting a deadline for filing written representations, I cannot assess the costs because the Court made no mention of costs in its judgment. MONTRÉAL, QUEBEC July 12, 2010 “Diane Perrier” DIANE PERRIER ASSESSMENT OFFICER FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-240-09 STYLE OF CAUSE: TRANSPORT ROBERT (1973) LTÉE v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN ASSESSMENT OF COSTS IN WRITING PLACE OF ASSESSMENT: Montréal, Quebec ASSESSMENT OF COSTS – REASONS: DIANE PERRIER ASSESSMENT OFFICER DATED: July 12, 2010 SOLICITORS OF RECORD: BCF LLP Montréal, Quebec FOR THE APPELLANT Myles J. Kirvan Deputy Attorney General of Canada Montréal, Quebec FOR THE RESPONDENT
Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca
Quebec (Attorney General) v A
[2013] 1 SCR 61