Olumide v. Conservative Party of Canada
Source text
Olumide v. Conservative Party of Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2015-07-22 Neutral citation 2015 FC 894 File numbers T-970-15 Decision Content Date: 20150722 Docket: T-970-15 Citation: 2015 FC 894 Ottawa, Ontario, July 22, 2015 PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Barnes BETWEEN: ADE OLUMIDE Applicant and CONSERVATIVE PARTY OF CANADA Respondent SUPPLEMENTARY ORDER AND REASONS [1] These are my supplementary Reasons dealing with the outstanding issue of costs in this proceeding. [2] When I gave my oral reasons at the conclusion of the hearing on June 19, 2015, Mr. Olumide requested that I reserve on the issue of costs to allow him time to consult legal counsel. I advised Mr. Olumide that if I heard from counsel by no later than June 25, 2015 I would consider a further extension if one was needed. Mr. Olumide has now made his submissions on costs without the assistance of counsel. [3] The Respondent was wholly successful in having the motion dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Mr. Olumide has been actively engaged in litigation in this Court and is well aware that there will usually be cost consequences from engaging unsuccessfully in litigation, particularly where the litigation is without merit. Mr. Olumide was forewarned that the Respondent was challenging the jurisdiction of this Court to grant the relief he was seeking. If he had taken the opportunity to consult with legal counsel, he would have been advised that his case against the Respondent was ho…
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Olumide v. Conservative Party of Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2015-07-22 Neutral citation 2015 FC 894 File numbers T-970-15 Decision Content Date: 20150722 Docket: T-970-15 Citation: 2015 FC 894 Ottawa, Ontario, July 22, 2015 PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Barnes BETWEEN: ADE OLUMIDE Applicant and CONSERVATIVE PARTY OF CANADA Respondent SUPPLEMENTARY ORDER AND REASONS [1] These are my supplementary Reasons dealing with the outstanding issue of costs in this proceeding. [2] When I gave my oral reasons at the conclusion of the hearing on June 19, 2015, Mr. Olumide requested that I reserve on the issue of costs to allow him time to consult legal counsel. I advised Mr. Olumide that if I heard from counsel by no later than June 25, 2015 I would consider a further extension if one was needed. Mr. Olumide has now made his submissions on costs without the assistance of counsel. [3] The Respondent was wholly successful in having the motion dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Mr. Olumide has been actively engaged in litigation in this Court and is well aware that there will usually be cost consequences from engaging unsuccessfully in litigation, particularly where the litigation is without merit. Mr. Olumide was forewarned that the Respondent was challenging the jurisdiction of this Court to grant the relief he was seeking. If he had taken the opportunity to consult with legal counsel, he would have been advised that his case against the Respondent was hopeless. He would also have been well advised to seek counsel in connection with the Respondent’s offer to dismiss this proceeding without costs. Instead, he pressed forward with a virtually incomprehensible argument. The motion was dismissed and the Respondent is now entitled to its reasonable costs. [4] The Respondent has incurred solicitor-client costs of more than $12,000.00. This is not surprising given the speed with which the matter was brought forward and the high quality of the submissions made by Mr. D’Angelo. The Respondent is seeking costs at the level of a substantial indemnity in the amount of $8,000.00 and HST. This amount would ordinarily be well above the usual sum for costs on a motion of this type. However, having regard to its reasonable settlement offer and the excessive length of the hearing, the Respondent is entitled to a premium for its costs which I fix in the amount of $5,500.00 inclusive of disbursements and HST. ORDER THIS COURT ORDERS that the Applicant shall pay forthwith to the Respondent costs in the amount $5,500.00 inclusive of disbursements and HST. "R.L. Barnes" Judge FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: t-970-15 STYLE OF CAUSE: ADE OLUMIDE v CONSERVATIVE PARTY OF CANADA PLACE OF HEARING: OTTAWA, Ontario DATE OF HEARING: June 19, 2015 order AND REASONS: BARNES J. DATED: July 22, 2015 APPEARANCES: Mr. Ade Olumide For The Applicant (ON HIS OWN BEHALF) Mr. Paul D'Angelo For The Respondent SOLICITORS OF RECORD: N/A For The Applicant Perley-Robertson, Hill & McDougall LLP/s.r.l. Ottawa, ON For The Respondent
Source: decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca
Administration des aéroports régionaux d’Edmonton c. Thibodeau
2024 CAF 196