Hydro Mobile Inc. v. Bennu Innovation Inc.
Court headnote
Hydro Mobile Inc. v. Bennu Innovation Inc. Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2001-06-05 Neutral citation 2001 FCT 591 File numbers T-270-01 Decision Content Date: 20010605 Docket: T-270-01 Neutral Citation: 2001 FCT 591 MONTREAL, QUEBEC, THIS 5th DAY OF JUNE 2001 PRESENT: RICHARD MORNEAU, ESQ., PROTHONOTARY BETWEEN: HYDRO MOBILE INC. Plaintiff AND BENNU INNOVATION INC. and JEAN G. ROBILLARD Defendants Requête des défendeurs visant à obtenir : 1. Une ordonnance en vertu de l'article 221(1) des Règles de la Cour fédérale (1998) radiant la déclaration dans sa totalité quant au défendeur ROBILLARD et rejetant l'action quant à cette partie; 2. Toute autre ordonnance que cette Honorable Cour jugera juste et utile de rendre; 3. Les dépens. REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER RICHARD MORNEAU, ESQ., PROTHONOTARY: [1] In light of what was mentioned by this Court in the case of Painblanc v. Kastner et al. (1994), 58 C.P.R. (3d) 502, and the jurisprudence cited therein, in my opinion, it is plain and obvious that the allegations found in paragraphs 11 and 12 of the Statement of Claim do not disclose sufficient material facts to properly engage the liability of Jean G. Robillard as a personal defendant. [2] I therefore order the striking out of Jean G. Robillard as a party defendant to this action, subject to the right of the plaintiff to file and serve an amendment on or before July 5, 2001, or within such further period as the parties may agree, alleging material facts which would…
Read full judgment
Hydro Mobile Inc. v. Bennu Innovation Inc. Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2001-06-05 Neutral citation 2001 FCT 591 File numbers T-270-01 Decision Content Date: 20010605 Docket: T-270-01 Neutral Citation: 2001 FCT 591 MONTREAL, QUEBEC, THIS 5th DAY OF JUNE 2001 PRESENT: RICHARD MORNEAU, ESQ., PROTHONOTARY BETWEEN: HYDRO MOBILE INC. Plaintiff AND BENNU INNOVATION INC. and JEAN G. ROBILLARD Defendants Requête des défendeurs visant à obtenir : 1. Une ordonnance en vertu de l'article 221(1) des Règles de la Cour fédérale (1998) radiant la déclaration dans sa totalité quant au défendeur ROBILLARD et rejetant l'action quant à cette partie; 2. Toute autre ordonnance que cette Honorable Cour jugera juste et utile de rendre; 3. Les dépens. REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER RICHARD MORNEAU, ESQ., PROTHONOTARY: [1] In light of what was mentioned by this Court in the case of Painblanc v. Kastner et al. (1994), 58 C.P.R. (3d) 502, and the jurisprudence cited therein, in my opinion, it is plain and obvious that the allegations found in paragraphs 11 and 12 of the Statement of Claim do not disclose sufficient material facts to properly engage the liability of Jean G. Robillard as a personal defendant. [2] I therefore order the striking out of Jean G. Robillard as a party defendant to this action, subject to the right of the plaintiff to file and serve an amendment on or before July 5, 2001, or within such further period as the parties may agree, alleging material facts which would, if proven, establish liability on the part of Jean G. Robillard. [3] Based on the wording of rule 221(1)(a) and the comments made by the Federal Court of Appeal in Coca-Cola Ltd. v. Pardhan (1999), 85 C.P.R. (3d) 489, at 493, I do not believe that the fact that a defence and an affidavit of documents have been produced by Mr. Robillard is a bar to the motion herein. [4] Costs of this motion go to the Defendants. Richard Morneau Prothonotary FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD COURT NO.: STYLE OF CAUSE: T-270-01 HYDRO MOBILE INC. Plaintiff AND BENNU INNOVATION INC. and JEAN G. ROBILLARD Defendants PLACE OF HEARING:Montreal, Quebec DATE OF HEARING:June 4, 2001 REASONS FOR ORDER BY RICHARD MORNEAU, ESQ., PROTHONOTARY DATE OF REASONS FOR ORDER:June 5, 2001 APPEARANCES: Mr. L.E. Trent Horne for the Plaintiff Mr. François Grenier Ms Chantal Éthier for the Defendants SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Sim, Hughes, Ashton & McKay Toronto, Ontario for the Plaintiff Léger Robic Richard Montreal, Quebec for the Defendants
Source: decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca