Skip to main content
Federal Court of Appeal· 2004

Eli Lilly and Co. v. Apotex Inc.

2004 FCA 202
GeneralJD
Cite or share
Share via WhatsAppEmail
Showing the official court-reporter headnote. An editorial brief (facts · issues · held · ratio · significance) is on the roadmap for this case. The judgment text below is the authoritative source.

Court headnote

Eli Lilly and Co. v. Apotex Inc. Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2004-05-20 Neutral citation 2004 FCA 202 File numbers A-549-03 Decision Content Date: 20040520 Docket: A-549-03 Citation: 2004 FCA 202 CORAM: DÉCARY J.A. SEXTON J.A. MALONE J.A. BETWEEN: ELI LILLY AND COMPANY and ELI LILLY CANADA INC. Appellants and APOTEX INC. Respondent and SHIONOGI & CO. LTD. Respondent Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on May 20, 2004. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on May 20, 2004. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: DÉCARY J.A. Date: 20040520 Docket: A-549-03 Citation: 2004 FCA 202 CORAM: DÉCARY J.A. SEXTON J.A. MALONE J.A. BETWEEN: ELI LILLY AND COMPANY and ELI LILLY CANADA INC. Appellants and APOTEX INC. Respondent and SHIONOGI & CO. LTD. Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on May 20, 2004) DÉCARY J.A. [1] We have not been persuaded that Pinard J. committed any reviewable error in affirming Prothonotary Aronovitch's decision not to allow the proposed amendment. [2] The appeal will be dismissed with costs. "Robert Décary" J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-549-03 STYLE OF CAUSE: ELI LILLY AND COMPANY and ELI LILLY CANADA INC. Appellants and APOTEX INC. Respondent and SHIONOGI & CO. LTD. Respondent PLACE OF HEARING: TORONTO, ONTARIO DATE OF HEARING: MAY 20, 2004 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT: (DÉCARY, SEXTON & MALONE JJ.A.) DELIVERED FROM TH…

Read full judgment
Eli Lilly and Co. v. Apotex Inc.
Court (s) Database
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date
2004-05-20
Neutral citation
2004 FCA 202
File numbers
A-549-03
Decision Content
Date: 20040520
Docket: A-549-03
Citation: 2004 FCA 202
CORAM: DÉCARY J.A.
SEXTON J.A.
MALONE J.A.
BETWEEN:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY and
ELI LILLY CANADA INC.
Appellants
and
APOTEX INC.
Respondent
and
SHIONOGI & CO. LTD.
Respondent
Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on May 20, 2004.
Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on May 20, 2004.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: DÉCARY J.A.
Date: 20040520
Docket: A-549-03
Citation: 2004 FCA 202
CORAM: DÉCARY J.A.
SEXTON J.A.
MALONE J.A.
BETWEEN:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY and
ELI LILLY CANADA INC.
Appellants
and
APOTEX INC.
Respondent
and
SHIONOGI & CO. LTD.
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
(Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on May 20, 2004)
DÉCARY J.A.
[1] We have not been persuaded that Pinard J. committed any reviewable error in affirming Prothonotary Aronovitch's decision not to allow the proposed amendment.
[2] The appeal will be dismissed with costs.
"Robert Décary"
J.A.
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: A-549-03
STYLE OF CAUSE: ELI LILLY AND COMPANY and
ELI LILLY CANADA INC.
Appellants
and
APOTEX INC.
Respondent
and
SHIONOGI & CO. LTD.
Respondent
PLACE OF HEARING: TORONTO, ONTARIO
DATE OF HEARING: MAY 20, 2004
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
OF THE COURT: (DÉCARY, SEXTON & MALONE JJ.A.)
DELIVERED FROM THE
BENCH BY: DÉCARY J.A.
APPEARANCES:
Mr. Patrick Smith
Mr. John Norman
FOR THE APPELLANTS
Mr. Nando De Luca
FOR THE RESPONDENT, APOTEX INC.
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP
Ottawa, Ontario
FOR THE APPELLANTS
Goodmans LLP
Toronto, Ontario
FOR THE RESPONDENT, APOTEX INC.

Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca

Related cases