Singh c. Canada (Ministre de la citoyenneté et de l'immigration)
Source text
Singh c. Canada (Ministre de la citoyenneté et de l'immigration) Base de données – Cour (s) Décisions de la Cour fédérale Date 2002-03-21 Référence neutre 2002 CFPI 309 Numéro de dossier IMM-1224-02 Contenu de la décision Date: 20020321 Docket: IMM-1224-02 Neutral Citation: 2002 FCT 309 BETWEEN: JAGWANT SINGH Applicant - and - THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent REASONS FOR ORDER BEAUDRY J.: [1] The applicant has been in Canada since 1995. [2] He is married to a Canadian citizen. He is the father figure to his stepson and he has a Canadian born child with his wife. [3] He has his own business and employ many Canadian citizens. He is the sole financial support for his family. [4] In November 2001, he filed a humanitarian and compassionate application for permanent residence based on the sponsorship of his spouse. This application has not been determined. [5] Considering the best interest of the children, I am satisfied that the applicant has met the tri-partite test in Toth v. Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration) (1988), 6 Imm. L.R. (2d) 123 (F.C.A.). [6] Therefore, this Court hereby orders that an interim stay of the removal of the applicant until determination of his application for permanent residence based on the sponsorship of his spouse. "Michel Beaudry" Judge OTTAWA, ONTARIO March 21, 2002…
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Singh c. Canada (Ministre de la citoyenneté et de l'immigration) Base de données – Cour (s) Décisions de la Cour fédérale Date 2002-03-21 Référence neutre 2002 CFPI 309 Numéro de dossier IMM-1224-02 Contenu de la décision Date: 20020321 Docket: IMM-1224-02 Neutral Citation: 2002 FCT 309 BETWEEN: JAGWANT SINGH Applicant - and - THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent REASONS FOR ORDER BEAUDRY J.: [1] The applicant has been in Canada since 1995. [2] He is married to a Canadian citizen. He is the father figure to his stepson and he has a Canadian born child with his wife. [3] He has his own business and employ many Canadian citizens. He is the sole financial support for his family. [4] In November 2001, he filed a humanitarian and compassionate application for permanent residence based on the sponsorship of his spouse. This application has not been determined. [5] Considering the best interest of the children, I am satisfied that the applicant has met the tri-partite test in Toth v. Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration) (1988), 6 Imm. L.R. (2d) 123 (F.C.A.). [6] Therefore, this Court hereby orders that an interim stay of the removal of the applicant until determination of his application for permanent residence based on the sponsorship of his spouse. "Michel Beaudry" Judge OTTAWA, ONTARIO March 21, 2002
Source: decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca
Démocratie en surveillance c. Canada (Procureur général)
2024 CAF 158