Dalstrom v. Canada
Source text
Dalstrom v. Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2013-02-04 Neutral citation 2013 FCA 21 File numbers A-319-12 Decision Content Date: 20130204 Docket: A-319-12 Citation: 2013 FCA 21 CORAM: EVANS J.A. DAWSON J.A. STRATAS J.A. BETWEEN: ALLEN DALSTROM Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent Heard at Vancouver, British Columbia, on February 4, 2013. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Vancouver, British Columbia, on February 4, 2013. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: STRATAS J.A. Date: 20130204 Docket: A-319-12 Citation: 2013 FCA 21 CORAM: EVANS J.A. DAWSON J.A. STRATAS J.A. BETWEEN: ALLEN DALSTROM Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Vancouver, British Columbia, on February 4, 2013) STRATAS J.A. [1] Mr. Dalstrom appeals from the interlocutory order of the Tax Court of Canada (per Angers J.): 2012 TCC 201. [2] The Tax Court concluded that service of the notice of appeal was properly effected by the Registry, in accordance with section 17.2 of the Tax Court of Canada Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. T-2. It then issued an order dealing with the filing, confidentiality and redaction of notices of motion, the notice of appeal and the reply to the notice of appeal. It also set out a procedure for determining the confidentiality of future filings and the hearing itself. Finally, it scheduled the steps in the appeal. [3] The appellant has not persuaded us that the Tax Court erred in any…
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Dalstrom v. Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2013-02-04 Neutral citation 2013 FCA 21 File numbers A-319-12 Decision Content Date: 20130204 Docket: A-319-12 Citation: 2013 FCA 21 CORAM: EVANS J.A. DAWSON J.A. STRATAS J.A. BETWEEN: ALLEN DALSTROM Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent Heard at Vancouver, British Columbia, on February 4, 2013. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Vancouver, British Columbia, on February 4, 2013. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: STRATAS J.A. Date: 20130204 Docket: A-319-12 Citation: 2013 FCA 21 CORAM: EVANS J.A. DAWSON J.A. STRATAS J.A. BETWEEN: ALLEN DALSTROM Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Vancouver, British Columbia, on February 4, 2013) STRATAS J.A. [1] Mr. Dalstrom appeals from the interlocutory order of the Tax Court of Canada (per Angers J.): 2012 TCC 201. [2] The Tax Court concluded that service of the notice of appeal was properly effected by the Registry, in accordance with section 17.2 of the Tax Court of Canada Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. T-2. It then issued an order dealing with the filing, confidentiality and redaction of notices of motion, the notice of appeal and the reply to the notice of appeal. It also set out a procedure for determining the confidentiality of future filings and the hearing itself. Finally, it scheduled the steps in the appeal. [3] The appellant has not persuaded us that the Tax Court erred in any way in its interpretation and application of the provisions before it, particularly section 17.2 of the Act. In any event, even if the respondent filed its reply out of time and was liable to have default judgment against it, the confusion existing in the circumstances described by the Tax Court would have provided ample grounds for the granting of an extension of time under subsection 63(2) of the Act. [4] Accordingly, we will dismiss the appeal with costs, which we will fix in the lump sum of $1,500, inclusive of disbursements and any applicable tax. “Stratas J.A.” J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-319-12 APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANGERS, DATED JUNE 29, 2012, DOCKET NO. 2012-332(IT)G STYLE OF CAUSE: Allen Dalstrom v. Her Majesty the Queen PLACE OF HEARING: Vancouver, British Columbia DATE OF HEARING: February 4, 2013 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: Evans, Dawson, Stratas JJ.A. DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: Stratas J.A. APPEARANCES: Alistair Campbell Michelle Moriartey FOR THE APPELLANT Bruce Senkpiel Melissa Nicholls FOR THE RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Legacy Tax + Trust Lawyers Vancouver, British Columbia FOR THE APPELLANT William F. Pentney Deputy Attorney General of Canada FOR THE RESPONDENT
Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca
Administration des aéroports régionaux d’Edmonton c. Thibodeau
2024 CAF 196