Skip to main content
Federal Court· 2001

Kirby v. Canada

2001 FCT 767
Quebec civil lawJD
Cite or share
Share via WhatsAppEmail
Showing the official court-reporter headnote. An editorial brief (facts · issues · held · ratio · significance) is on the roadmap for this case. The judgment text below is the authoritative source.

Court headnote

Kirby v. Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2001-07-05 Neutral citation 2001 FCT 767 File numbers T-849-00 Decision Content Date: 20010705 Docket: T-849-00 Neutral Citation: 2001 FCT 767 Between: CATHY KIRBY AND SAMUEL KIRBY Plaintiffs AND HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN and THE MINISTER OF INDIAN AFFAIRS AND NORTHERN DEVELOPMENT and THE DEPARTMENT OF INDIAN AFFAIRS AND NORTHERN DEVELOPMENT Defendants ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS MICHELLE LAMY, ASSESSMENT OFFICER [1] On July 14, 2000, the Court struck out the plaintiffs' statement of claim under paragraph 221(1)(f) of the Federal Court Rules, 1998, the whole with costs. Following this judgment, the defendants filed on January 12, 2001 their bill of costs and asked that it be assessed without personal appearance of the parties. [2] On May 24, 2001, we sent a copy of the bill of costs to the plaintiffs so they could submit their written representations. On June 8, we received a letter from the plaintiffs' counsel informing us that he did not contest the costs requested. [3] In view of the preceding, the defendants' costs are assessed and allowed as requested in the amount of $1,950.85. A certificate shall issue for that amount. MICHELLE LAMY ASSESSMENT OFFICER MONTRÉAL, QUEBEC July 5, 2001 Certified true translation Suzanne M. Gauthier, LL.L., Trad. a. FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA TRIAL DIVISION Date: 20010705 Docket: T-849-00 Between: CATHY KIRBY AND SAMUEL KIRBY Plaintiffs AND HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN and THE MINISTER OF I…

Read full judgment
Kirby v. Canada
Court (s) Database
Federal Court Decisions
Date
2001-07-05
Neutral citation
2001 FCT 767
File numbers
T-849-00
Decision Content
Date: 20010705
Docket: T-849-00
Neutral Citation: 2001 FCT 767
Between:
CATHY KIRBY AND SAMUEL KIRBY
Plaintiffs
AND
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
and
THE MINISTER OF INDIAN AFFAIRS
AND NORTHERN DEVELOPMENT
and
THE DEPARTMENT OF INDIAN AFFAIRS
AND NORTHERN DEVELOPMENT
Defendants
ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS
MICHELLE LAMY, ASSESSMENT OFFICER
[1] On July 14, 2000, the Court struck out the plaintiffs' statement of claim under paragraph 221(1)(f) of the Federal Court Rules, 1998, the whole with costs. Following this judgment, the defendants filed on January 12, 2001 their bill of costs and asked that it be assessed without personal appearance of the parties.
[2] On May 24, 2001, we sent a copy of the bill of costs to the plaintiffs so they could submit their written representations. On June 8, we received a letter from the plaintiffs' counsel informing us that he did not contest the costs requested.
[3] In view of the preceding, the defendants' costs are assessed and allowed as requested in the amount of $1,950.85. A certificate shall issue for that amount.
MICHELLE LAMY
ASSESSMENT OFFICER
MONTRÉAL, QUEBEC
July 5, 2001
Certified true translation
Suzanne M. Gauthier, LL.L., Trad. a.
FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA
TRIAL DIVISION
Date: 20010705
Docket: T-849-00
Between:
CATHY KIRBY AND SAMUEL KIRBY
Plaintiffs
AND
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
and
THE MINISTER OF INDIAN AFFAIRS
AND NORTHERN DEVELOPMENT
and
THE DEPARTMENT OF INDIAN AFFAIRS
AND NORTHERN DEVELOPMENT
Defendants
ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS
FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA
TRIAL DIVISION
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET NO: T-849-00
Between:
CATHY KIRBY AND SAMUEL KIRBY
Plaintiffs
AND
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
and
THE MINISTER OF INDIAN AFFAIRS
AND NORTHERN DEVELOPMENT
and
THE DEPARTMENT OF INDIAN AFFAIRS
AND NORTHERN DEVELOPMENT
Defendants
ASSESSMENT OF COSTS WITHOUT PERSONAL APPEARANCE
REASONS OF M. LAMY, ASSESSMENT OFFICER
PLACE OF ASSESSMENT: Montréal, Quebec
DATE OF REASONS: July 5, 2001
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Rouleau, Doss, d'Amours for the plaintiffs
Montréal, Quebec
Morris Rosenberg for the defendants
Deputy Attorney General of Canada

Source: decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca

Related cases