Giguère v. Canada

Giguère v. Canada
Court (s) Database
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date
2017-05-01
Neutral citation
2017 FCA 91
File numbers
A-408-15, A-409-15, A-410-15, A-411-15, A-412-15, A-413-15
Decision Content
Date: 20170501
Dockets: A-408-15
A-409-15
A-410-15
A-411-15
A-412-15
A-413-15
Citation: 2017 FCA 91
[ENGLISH TRANSLATION]
CORAM:
NADON J.A.
GAUTHIER J.A.
TRUDEL J.A.
Docket: A-408-15
BETWEEN:
ANTOINE BÉRUBÉ
Appellant
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Respondent
Docket: A-409-15
BETWEEN:
ANTOINE BÉRUBÉ
Appellant
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Respondent
Docket: A-410-15
BETWEEN:
PHILIPPE D’AUTEUIL
Appellant
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Respondent
Docket: A-411-15
BETWEEN:
PHILIPPE D’AUTEUIL
Appellant
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Respondent
Docket: A-412-15
BETWEEN:
MARTIN FOURNIER GIGUÈRE
Appellant
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Respondent
Docket: A-413-15
BETWEEN:
MARTIN FOURNIER GIGUÈRE
Appellant
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Respondent
Heard at Quebec City, Quebec, on May 1, 2017.
Judgment delivered from the bench at Quebec City, Quebec, on May 1, 2017.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
NADON J.A.
Date: 20170501
Dockets: A-408-15
A-409-15
A-410-15
A-411-15
A-412-15
A-413-15
Citation: 2017 FCA 91
CORAM:
NADON J.A.
GAUTHIER J.A.
TRUDEL J.A.
Docket: A-408-15
BETWEEN:
ANTOINE BÉRUBÉ
Appellant
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Respondent
Docket: A-409-15
BETWEEN:
ANTOINE BÉRUBÉ
Appellant
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Respondent
Docket: A-410-15
BETWEEN:
PHILIPPE D’AUTEUIL
Appellant
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Respondent
Docket: A-411-15
BETWEEN:
PHILIPPE D’AUTEUIL
Appellant
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Respondent
Docket: A-412-15
BETWEEN:
MARTIN FOURNIER GIGUÈRE
Appellant
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Respondent
Docket: A-413-15
BETWEEN:
MARTIN FOURNIER GIGUÈRE
Appellant
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
(Delivered from the bench at Quebec City, Quebec, on May 1, 2017.)
NADON J.A.
[1] Despite the very able presentation by counsel for the appellants, we are of the view that our intervention is not warranted. More specifically, we were not satisfied that the judge had committed an error in law or a palpable and overriding error in assessing the relevant facts.
[2] Accordingly, the appeal will be dismissed with only one set of costs for the six files.
[3] A copy of these reasons will be placed in the related files to serve as reasons therein.
“M. Nadon”
J.A.
Certified true translation
Janine Anderson, Revisor
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKETS:
A-408-15, A-409-15, A-410-15,
A-411-15, A-412,15, A-413-13
STYLE OF CAUSE:
A-408-15
ANTOINE BÉRUBÉ v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
A-409-15
ANTOINE BÉRUBÉ v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
A-410-15
PHILIPPE D’AUTEUIL v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
A-411-15
PHILIPPE D’AUTEUIL v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
A-412-15
MARTIN FOURNIER GIGUÈRE v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
A-413-15
MARTIN FOURNIER GIGUÈRE v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
PLACE OF HEARING:
QUEBEC CITY, QUEBEC
DATE OF HEARING:
MAY 1, 2017
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
NADON J.A.
GAUTHIER J.A.
TRUDEL J.A.
DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY:
NADON J.A.
APPEARANCES:
Bernard Roy
Marie Cossette
FOR THE APPELLANTS
Simon Vincent
FOR THE RESPONDENT
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
LAVERY, DE BILLY, LLP.
Quebec City, Quebec
FOR THE APPELLANTS
William F. Pentney
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
FOR THE RESPONDENT