Skip to main content
Federal Court of Appeal· 2003

Andrasik v. Canada Customs and Revenue Agency

2003 FCA 252
GeneralJD
Cite or share
Share via WhatsAppEmail
Showing the official court-reporter headnote. An editorial brief (facts · issues · held · ratio · significance) is on the roadmap for this case. The judgment text below is the authoritative source.

Court headnote

Andrasik v. Canada Customs and Revenue Agency Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2003-06-04 Neutral citation 2003 FCA 252 File numbers A-648-02 Decision Content Date:20030604 Docket: A-648-02 Citation: 2003 FCA 252 CORAM: LINDEN J.A. ROTHSTEIN J.A. SEXTON J.A. BETWEEN: JULIUS P. ANDRASIK Appellant and CANADA CUSTOMS AND REVENUE AGENCY Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT LINDEN J.A. [1] We are not persuaded that the Trial Judge, in affirming the decision of the Minister in relation to the taxation years 1985-96, erred in any way so as to permit this Court to interfere. [2] The appeal will be dismissed, in the circumstances, without costs. "A.M. Linden" J.A. "I agree Marshall Rothstein" "I agree J. Edgar Sexton" …

Read full judgment
Andrasik v. Canada Customs and Revenue Agency
Court (s) Database
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date
2003-06-04
Neutral citation
2003 FCA 252
File numbers
A-648-02
Decision Content
Date:20030604
Docket: A-648-02
Citation: 2003 FCA 252
CORAM: LINDEN J.A.
ROTHSTEIN J.A.
SEXTON J.A.
BETWEEN:
JULIUS P. ANDRASIK
Appellant
and
CANADA CUSTOMS
AND REVENUE AGENCY
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
LINDEN J.A.
[1] We are not persuaded that the Trial Judge, in affirming the decision of the Minister in relation to the taxation years 1985-96, erred in any way so as to permit this Court to interfere.
[2] The appeal will be dismissed, in the circumstances, without costs.
"A.M. Linden"
J.A.
"I agree
Marshall Rothstein"
"I agree
J. Edgar Sexton"

Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca

Related cases