Skip to main content
Supreme Court of Canada· 1918

De Felice v. O'Brien

(1918) 59 SCR 684
Quebec civil lawJD
Cite or share
Share via WhatsAppEmail
Showing the official court-reporter headnote. An editorial brief (facts · issues · held · ratio · significance) is on the roadmap for this case. The judgment text below is the authoritative source.

Court headnote

De Felice v. O'Brien Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1918-12-23 Report (1918) 59 SCR 684 Judges Davies, Louis Henry; Idington, John; Anglin, Francis Alexander; Brodeur, Louis-Philippe; Mignault, Pierre-Basile On appeal from Quebec Subjects Sale Decision Content Supreme Court of Canada De Felice v. O’Brien, (1918) 59 S.C.R. 684 Date: 1918-12-23 De Felice v. O Brien. 1918: November 27; 1918 December 23. Present: Sir Louis Davies C.J. and Idington, Anglin, Brodeur and Mignault JJ. ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF KING'S BENCH, APPEAL SIDE, PROVINCE OF QUEBEC. Sale—Acceptance—Defects—Destruction of the goods. APPEAL from the judgment of the Court of King's Bench, appeal side[1], affirming the judgment of the Superior Court, District of Montreal, and dismissing the appellant's, plaintiff's, action. The appellant is a manufacturer of cigars and ordered from the respondent the delivery of tobacco which was accepted. The appellant then made 70,000 cigars. Later on his clients complained that the tobacco did not burn and a certain part of these cigars were returned to the appellant, of which fact he advised the respondent. On the 26 May, 1916, the appellant offered to return to respondent 40,000 out of the 70,000. On the 17th June, the appellant advised the respondent that these cigars had been destroyed. On the 18th July, the appellant took this action in damages for $4,879. The trial court dismissed the action; and the Court of Bang's Bench affirmed this judgment. On appeal to th…

Read full judgment
De Felice v. O'Brien
Collection
Supreme Court Judgments
Date
1918-12-23
Report
(1918) 59 SCR 684
Judges
Davies, Louis Henry; Idington, John; Anglin, Francis Alexander; Brodeur, Louis-Philippe; Mignault, Pierre-Basile
On appeal from
Quebec
Subjects
Sale
Decision Content
Supreme Court of Canada
De Felice v. O’Brien, (1918) 59 S.C.R. 684
Date: 1918-12-23
De Felice v. O Brien.
1918: November 27; 1918 December 23.
Present: Sir Louis Davies C.J. and Idington, Anglin, Brodeur and Mignault JJ.
ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF KING'S BENCH, APPEAL SIDE, PROVINCE OF QUEBEC.
Sale—Acceptance—Defects—Destruction of the goods.
APPEAL from the judgment of the Court of King's Bench, appeal side[1], affirming the judgment of the Superior Court, District of Montreal, and dismissing the appellant's, plaintiff's, action.
The appellant is a manufacturer of cigars and ordered from the respondent the delivery of tobacco which was accepted. The appellant then made 70,000 cigars. Later on his clients complained that the tobacco did not burn and a certain part of these cigars were returned to the appellant, of which fact he advised the respondent. On the 26 May, 1916, the appellant offered to return to respondent 40,000 out of the 70,000. On the 17th June, the appellant advised the respondent that these cigars had been destroyed. On the 18th July, the appellant took this action in damages for $4,879.
The trial court dismissed the action; and the Court of Bang's Bench affirmed this judgment.
On appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada, after hearing counsel on behalf of both parties, the court reserved judgment, and, on a subsequent date, dismissed the appeal with costs, the Chief Justice and Mignault J. dissenting.
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Edmond Brossard K.C. for the appellant.
Kavanagh K.C. and J. H. Gérin-Lajoie for the respondent.
[1] Q.R. 27 K.B. 192.

Source: decisions.scc-csc.ca

Related cases