Skip to main content
Federal Court of Appeal· 2003

Biao v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)

2003 FCA 75
Quebec civil lawJD
Cite or share
Share via WhatsAppEmail
Showing the official court-reporter headnote. An editorial brief (facts · issues · held · ratio · significance) is on the roadmap for this case. The judgment text below is the authoritative source.

Court headnote

Biao v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2003-02-12 Neutral citation 2003 FCA 75 File numbers A-752-99 Decision Content Date: 20030212 Docket: A-752-99 Neutral citation: 2003 FCA 75 BETWEEN: GUO YONG BIAO Appellant AND THE MINISTER OF IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP Respondent ASSESSMENT OF COSTS _ REASONS MICHELLE LAMY, ASSESSMENT OFFICER [1] This is an assessment in writing of costs owed the respondent following the judgment on February 28, 2001, dismissing the appeal with costs. [2] The appellant had until January 24, 2003, to make submissions opposing the respondent's bill of costs. [3] As no opposition has been received to date and the various claims seem reasonable, all the fees, except for those requested for the assessment of costs, are allowed as such. An amount of $220 is awarded under item 26 of Tariff B. [4] The disbursements incurred for the costs of service in the amount of $14 are awarded, as they were supported by affidavit. However, the photocopying costs in the amount of $53.55 are disallowed as the respondent submitted no documentation or explanation in support of this expense. [5] In light of the foregoing, the respondent's costs are assessed in the amount of $1,356. A certificate is issued for that amount. "Michelle Lamy" Assessment Officer MONTRÉAL, QUEBEC February 12, 2003 Certified true translation Suzanne M. Gauthier, C. Tr., LL.L. FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA APPEAL DIVISION Date: 20030…

Read full judgment
Biao v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)
Court (s) Database
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date
2003-02-12
Neutral citation
2003 FCA 75
File numbers
A-752-99
Decision Content
Date: 20030212
Docket: A-752-99
Neutral citation: 2003 FCA 75
BETWEEN:
GUO YONG BIAO
Appellant
AND
THE MINISTER OF IMMIGRATION
AND CITIZENSHIP
Respondent
ASSESSMENT OF COSTS _ REASONS
MICHELLE LAMY, ASSESSMENT OFFICER
[1] This is an assessment in writing of costs owed the respondent following the judgment on February 28, 2001, dismissing the appeal with costs.
[2] The appellant had until January 24, 2003, to make submissions opposing the respondent's bill of costs.
[3] As no opposition has been received to date and the various claims seem reasonable, all the fees, except for those requested for the assessment of costs, are allowed as such. An amount of $220 is awarded under item 26 of Tariff B.
[4] The disbursements incurred for the costs of service in the amount of $14 are awarded, as they were supported by affidavit. However, the photocopying costs in the amount of $53.55 are disallowed as the respondent submitted no documentation or explanation in support of this expense.
[5] In light of the foregoing, the respondent's costs are assessed in the amount of $1,356. A certificate is issued for that amount.
"Michelle Lamy"
Assessment Officer
MONTRÉAL, QUEBEC
February 12, 2003
Certified true translation
Suzanne M. Gauthier, C. Tr., LL.L.
FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA
APPEAL DIVISION
Date: 20030212
Docket: A-752-99
BETWEEN:
GUO YONG BIAO
Appellant
AND
THE MINISTER OF IMMIGRATION
AND CITIZENSHIP
Respondent
ASSESSMENT OF COSTS _ REASONS
FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA
APPEAL DIVISION
Date: 20030212
Docket: A-752-99
BETWEEN:
GUO YONG BIAO
Appellant
AND
THE MINISTER OF IMMIGRATION
AND CITIZENSHIP
Respondent
CERTIFICATE OF ASSESSMENT OF COSTS
FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA
APPEAL DIVISION
SOLICITORS OF RECORD
COURT FILE No.: A-752-99
Between: GUO YONG BIAO
AND
THE MINISTER OF IMMIGRATION
AND CITIZENSHIP
ASSESSMENT OF COSTS WITHOUT PERSONAL APPEARANCE
PLACE OF ASSESSMENT: Montréal, Quebec
REASONS BY: MICHELLE LAMY, ASSESSMENT OFFICER
DATE OF REASONS: February 12, 2003
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Kaufman, Laramée for the appellant
Montréal, Quebec
Morris Rosenberg for the respondent
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
Montréal, Quebec

Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca

Related cases