Sturtevant v. Canada
Source text
Sturtevant v. Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2007-12-06 Neutral citation 2007 FCA 387 File numbers A-407-05 Decision Content Date: 20071206 Docket: A-407-05 Citation: 2007 FCA 387 BETWEEN: LLOYD STURTEVANT Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent ASSESSMENT OF COSTS – REASONS DIANE PERRIER, ASSESSMENT OFFICIER [1] This is an assessment of the bill of costs due to the respondent following a judgment dated September 14, 2006, dismissing the appeal filed from a decision of the Tax Court of Canada. [2] On January 22, 2007, counsel for the respondent filed his bill of costs and asked that it be assessed without the appearance of the parties. On June 15, 2007, letters setting a schedule were sent to the parties. To date, we have received no written submissions from the parties. I am now prepared to proceed with assessment of the bill of costs based on the documentation on the record. [3] Fees are set at $1,399.92 for services rendered under the following items: item 19 – memorandum of fact and law (5 units), item 22 – counsel fees at hearing for first counsel, for each hour (2 units x 1,833 hours), item 25 – services after judgment (1 unit) and item 26 – assessment of costs (2 units) of Tariff B. I have reduced the number of units for the assessment of costs to 2 since this was a simple and uncontested case. [4] Disbursements in the amount of $43.86 are allowed as claimed, since they were proven by the affidavit of Dany Leduc and the accompan…
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Sturtevant v. Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2007-12-06 Neutral citation 2007 FCA 387 File numbers A-407-05 Decision Content Date: 20071206 Docket: A-407-05 Citation: 2007 FCA 387 BETWEEN: LLOYD STURTEVANT Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent ASSESSMENT OF COSTS – REASONS DIANE PERRIER, ASSESSMENT OFFICIER [1] This is an assessment of the bill of costs due to the respondent following a judgment dated September 14, 2006, dismissing the appeal filed from a decision of the Tax Court of Canada. [2] On January 22, 2007, counsel for the respondent filed his bill of costs and asked that it be assessed without the appearance of the parties. On June 15, 2007, letters setting a schedule were sent to the parties. To date, we have received no written submissions from the parties. I am now prepared to proceed with assessment of the bill of costs based on the documentation on the record. [3] Fees are set at $1,399.92 for services rendered under the following items: item 19 – memorandum of fact and law (5 units), item 22 – counsel fees at hearing for first counsel, for each hour (2 units x 1,833 hours), item 25 – services after judgment (1 unit) and item 26 – assessment of costs (2 units) of Tariff B. I have reduced the number of units for the assessment of costs to 2 since this was a simple and uncontested case. [4] Disbursements in the amount of $43.86 are allowed as claimed, since they were proven by the affidavit of Dany Leduc and the accompanying exhibits. [5] The bill of costs submitted for $1,683.78 is allowed in the amount of $1,443.78. A certificate of assessment will be issued in this matter. “Diane Perrier” DIANE PERRIER ASSESSMENT OFFICER QUÉBEC, QUEBEC December 6, 2007 Certified true translation Susan Deichert, Reviser FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-407-05 STYLE OF CAUSE: LLOYD STURTEVANT v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN ASSESSMENT OF COSTS WITHOUT APPEARANCE OF THE PARTIES REASONS BY: DIANE PERRIER, ASSESSMENT OFFICER DATED: December 6, 2007 SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Jodoin, Huppé Granby, Quebec FOR THE APPELLANT John H. Sims, Q.C. Deputy Attorney General of Canada Montréal, Quebec FOR THE RESPONDENT
Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca
Quebec (Attorney General) v A
[2013] 1 SCR 61