Cirahan v. Canada (Minister Of Citizenship And Immigration)
Court headnote
Cirahan v. Canada (Minister Of Citizenship And Immigration) Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2001-10-03 Neutral citation 2001 FCT 1091 File numbers IMM-4484-01 Decision Content Date: 20011003 Docket: IMM-4484-01 Neutral citation: 2001 FCT 1091 BETWEEN: KAZIM CIRAHAN Applicant and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent ORDER AND REASONS FOR ORDER NADON J. [1] Although Ms. Rochester made very forceful arguments with respect to the existence of a serious question, I need not decide this issue. [2] After reviewing the evidence and considering the arguments made by both sides, I have not been persuaded that irreparable harm will result if I do not grant the Applicant the stay which he seeks to obtain. [3] Thus, as the Applicant has not met the relevant test, as enunciated by the Federal Court of Appeal in Toth v. Minister of Employment and Immigration, (1988) 86 N.R. 302, his application for a stay of execution of the deportation order made against him is dismissed. Marc Nadon Judge Montreal, Quebec October 3, 2001 FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA TRIAL DIVISION Date: 20011003 Docket: IMM-4484-01 BETWEEN: KAZIM CIRAHAN Applicant and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent ORDER AND REASONS FOR ORDER FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA TRIAL DIVISION NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: IMM-4484-01 STYLE OF CAUSE: KAZIM CIRAHAN Applicant and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent PLACE OF HEARING: Montreal, Quebec DATE OF HEARIN…
Read full judgment
Cirahan v. Canada (Minister Of Citizenship And Immigration) Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2001-10-03 Neutral citation 2001 FCT 1091 File numbers IMM-4484-01 Decision Content Date: 20011003 Docket: IMM-4484-01 Neutral citation: 2001 FCT 1091 BETWEEN: KAZIM CIRAHAN Applicant and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent ORDER AND REASONS FOR ORDER NADON J. [1] Although Ms. Rochester made very forceful arguments with respect to the existence of a serious question, I need not decide this issue. [2] After reviewing the evidence and considering the arguments made by both sides, I have not been persuaded that irreparable harm will result if I do not grant the Applicant the stay which he seeks to obtain. [3] Thus, as the Applicant has not met the relevant test, as enunciated by the Federal Court of Appeal in Toth v. Minister of Employment and Immigration, (1988) 86 N.R. 302, his application for a stay of execution of the deportation order made against him is dismissed. Marc Nadon Judge Montreal, Quebec October 3, 2001 FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA TRIAL DIVISION Date: 20011003 Docket: IMM-4484-01 BETWEEN: KAZIM CIRAHAN Applicant and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent ORDER AND REASONS FOR ORDER FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA TRIAL DIVISION NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: IMM-4484-01 STYLE OF CAUSE: KAZIM CIRAHAN Applicant and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent PLACE OF HEARING: Montreal, Quebec DATE OF HEARING: October 1, 2001 ORDER AND REASONS FOR ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NADON DATED: October 3, 2001 APPEARANCES: Ms. Vonnie E. Rochester FOR APPLICANT Mr. François Joyal FOR RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Ms. Vonnie E. Rochester FOR APPLICANT Morris Rosenberg Deputy Attorney General of Canada Montreal, Quebec FOR RESPONDENT
Source: decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca