Wanna v. Canada (Minister of National Revenue)
Source text
Wanna v. Canada (Minister of National Revenue) Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2006-04-19 Neutral citation 2006 FC 496 File numbers T-1337-05 Decision Content Date: 20060419 Docket: T-1337-05 Citation: 2006 FC 496 Between: CAMILLE WANNA Plaintiff and MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE Defendant ASSESSMENT OF COSTS – REASONS MICHELLE LAMY, ASSESSMENT OFFICER [1] This is an assessment of the defendant’s costs following the judgment of October 3, 2005 dismissing the action at bar and the order of December 19, 2005 dismissing a motion by the plaintiff for an extension of time. At the defendant’s request, I issued a schedule directing the parties to make their written submissions. As I have received no reply, I am prepared to proceed with the assessment of the bills as submitted. [2] Apart from item 26, the fees are awarded as requested in the amount of $1,986 for items 5 (14 units), 6 (3 units x 11 min.) and 26 (2 units) of Tariff B. As the plaintiff has made no submissions, I must assume that the compensation sought is reasonable in the circumstances. As the bills were assessed simultaneously, I award 2 units under item 26. [3] All the disbursements incurred in this case, evidence of which was provided by affidavit, are allowed in the amount of $128.11. [4] In conclusion, the defendant’s costs are assessed and allowed in the sum of $2,114.11. A certificate is issued for that amount. Montréal, Quebec, April 19, 2006 “Michelle Lamy” MICHELLE LAMY ASSESSMENT OFFICER Certi…
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Wanna v. Canada (Minister of National Revenue) Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2006-04-19 Neutral citation 2006 FC 496 File numbers T-1337-05 Decision Content Date: 20060419 Docket: T-1337-05 Citation: 2006 FC 496 Between: CAMILLE WANNA Plaintiff and MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE Defendant ASSESSMENT OF COSTS – REASONS MICHELLE LAMY, ASSESSMENT OFFICER [1] This is an assessment of the defendant’s costs following the judgment of October 3, 2005 dismissing the action at bar and the order of December 19, 2005 dismissing a motion by the plaintiff for an extension of time. At the defendant’s request, I issued a schedule directing the parties to make their written submissions. As I have received no reply, I am prepared to proceed with the assessment of the bills as submitted. [2] Apart from item 26, the fees are awarded as requested in the amount of $1,986 for items 5 (14 units), 6 (3 units x 11 min.) and 26 (2 units) of Tariff B. As the plaintiff has made no submissions, I must assume that the compensation sought is reasonable in the circumstances. As the bills were assessed simultaneously, I award 2 units under item 26. [3] All the disbursements incurred in this case, evidence of which was provided by affidavit, are allowed in the amount of $128.11. [4] In conclusion, the defendant’s costs are assessed and allowed in the sum of $2,114.11. A certificate is issued for that amount. Montréal, Quebec, April 19, 2006 “Michelle Lamy” MICHELLE LAMY ASSESSMENT OFFICER Certified true translation François Brunet, LLB, BCL FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: T-1337-05 STYLE OF CAUSE: CAMILLE WANNA v. MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE ASSESSMENT OF COSTS IN WRITING PLACE OF ASSESSMENT: Montréal, Quebec REASONS BY: Michelle Lamy, Assessment Officer DATED: April 19, 2006 SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Anthony Karkar for the plaintiff Montréal, Quebec John H. Sims, Q.C. for the defendant Deputy Attorney General of Canada
Source: decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca
Quebec (Attorney General) v A
[2013] 1 SCR 61