Cross-Canada Auto Body Supply (Windsor) Limited v. Hyundai Auto Canada

Cross-Canada Auto Body Supply (Windsor) Limited v. Hyundai Auto Canada
Court (s) Database
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date
2008-03-11
Neutral citation
2008 FCA 98
File numbers
A-311-07
Decision Content
Date: 20080311
Docket: A-311-07
Citation: 2008 FCA 98
CORAM: DESJARDINS J.A.
NOËL J.A.
TRUDEL J.A.
BETWEEN:
CROSS-CANADA AUTO BODY SUPPLY (WINDSOR) LIMITED,
CROSS-CANADA AUTO BODY SUPPLY (WEST) LIMITED
and
AT PAC WEST AUTO PARTS ENTERPRISE LTD.,
Appellants
(Applicants)
and
HYUNDAI AUTO CANADA, A DIVISION OF
HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA,
Respondent
(Respondent)
Heard at Montréal, Quebec, on March 11, 2008.
Judgment delivered from the Bench at Montréal, Quebec, on March 11, 2008.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: NOËL J.A.
Date: 20080311
Docket: A-311-07
Citation: 2008 FCA 98
CORAM: DESJARDINS J.A.
NOËL J.A.
TRUDEL J.A.
BETWEEN:
CROSS-CANADA AUTO BODY SUPPLY (WINDSOR) LIMITED,
CROSS-CANADA AUTO BODY SUPPLY (WEST) LIMITED
and
AT PAC WEST AUTO PARTS ENTERPRISE LTD.,
Appellants
(Applicants)
and
HYUNDAI AUTO CANADA, A DIVISION OF
HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA,
Respondent
(Respondent)
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
(Delivered from the Bench at Montréal, Quebec, on March 11, 2008)
NOËL J.A.
[1] Given the question that was put to the applications judge by counsel for both parties, i.e. whether the trade-marks in issue were distinctive of the seller, Hyundai Canada, to the exclusion of the manufacturer, Hyundai Korea, or vice versa, we are satisfied that the trial judge committed no palpable or overriding error in concluding that the trade-marks were distinctive of Hyundai Canada.
[2] Similarly, we see no basis for intervening in the applications judge’s conclusion that the appellants had failed to meet their burden of establishing that the “HMC Design” and “HD & Hyundai Design” trade-marks were abandoned. There was no palpable or overriding error in this regard.
[3] The appeal will be dismissed with costs.
“Marc Noël”
J.A.
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: A-311-07
APPEAL FROM A JUDGMENT OF THE HONOURABLE MADAM JUSTICE TREMBLAY-LAMER DATED JUNE 1, 2007, DOCKET NO. T-1005-05.
STYLE OF CAUSE: CROSS-CANADA AUTO BODY SUPPLY (WINDSOR) LIMITED ET AL v. HYUNDAI AUTO CANADA, A DIVISION OF HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA
PLACE OF HEARING: Montréal, Quebec
DATE OF HEARING: March 11, 2008
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: DESJARDINS J.A.
NOËL J.A.
TRUDEL J.A.
DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: NOËL J.A.
APPEARANCES:
Mr. François Grenier
FOR THE APPELLANTS (APPLICANTS)
Mr. Scott Fairley
Mr. Jeffrey Brown
FOR THE RESPONDENT (RESPONDENT)
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Léger Robic Richard LLP
Montréal, Quebec
FOR THE APPELLANTS (APPLICANTS)
Theall Group LLP
Toronto, Ontario
FOR THE RESPONDENT (RESPONDENT)