Skip to main content
Federal Court· 2001

Harry D. Shields Ltd. v. Canada

2001 FCT 361
GeneralJD
Cite or share
Share via WhatsAppEmail
Showing the official court-reporter headnote. An editorial brief (facts · issues · held · ratio · significance) is on the roadmap for this case. The judgment text below is the authoritative source.

Court headnote

Harry D. Shields Ltd. v. Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2001-04-20 Neutral citation 2001 FCT 361 File numbers T-6485-81 Decision Content Date: 20010420 Docket: T-6485-81 Neutral Citation: FCT 2001 361 Ottawa, Ontario, this 20th day of April, 2001 PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JOHN A. O'KEEFE BETWEEN: HARRY D. SHIELDS LIMITED Plaintiff - and - HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Defendant REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER O'KEEFE J. [1] As part of the order issued in this matter, I gave the parties the opportunity to make submissions as to costs. Both parties have made submissions to me. The plaintiff requests costs in the amount of $5,500. The defendant submits that no costs should be awarded to the plaintiff as the plaintiff conceded summary judgment on all the issues except abuse of public authority. [2] I have reviewed the submissions of both parties and I cannot agree with the position of either party. In a case such as this, I am of the opinion that costs should be costs in the cause. ORDER [3] IT IS ORDERED that the costs of the motion for summary judgment shall be costs in the cause. "John A. O'Keefe" J.F.C.C. Ottawa, Ontario April 20, 2001 …

Read full judgment
Harry D. Shields Ltd. v. Canada
Court (s) Database
Federal Court Decisions
Date
2001-04-20
Neutral citation
2001 FCT 361
File numbers
T-6485-81
Decision Content
Date: 20010420
Docket: T-6485-81
Neutral Citation: FCT 2001 361
Ottawa, Ontario, this 20th day of April, 2001
PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JOHN A. O'KEEFE
BETWEEN:
HARRY D. SHIELDS LIMITED
Plaintiff
- and -
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Defendant
REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER
O'KEEFE J.
[1] As part of the order issued in this matter, I gave the parties the opportunity to make submissions as to costs. Both parties have made submissions to me. The plaintiff requests costs in the amount of $5,500. The defendant submits that no costs should be awarded to the plaintiff as the plaintiff conceded summary judgment on all the issues except abuse of public authority.
[2] I have reviewed the submissions of both parties and I cannot agree with the position of either party. In a case such as this, I am of the opinion that costs should be costs in the cause.
ORDER
[3] IT IS ORDERED that the costs of the motion for summary judgment shall be costs in the cause.
"John A. O'Keefe"
J.F.C.C.
Ottawa, Ontario
April 20, 2001

Source: decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca

Related cases