Cliche v. Canada (Attorney General)
Source text
Cliche v. Canada (Attorney General) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2013-01-15 Neutral citation 2013 FCA 8 File numbers A-168-12 Decision Content Date: 20130115 Docket: A-168-12 Citation: 2013 FCA 8 CORAM: NOËL J.A. PELLETIER J.A. MAINVILLE J.A. BETWEEN: STEPHAN CLICHE Appellant and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent Hearing held at Montreal, Quebec, on January 15, 2013. Judgment delivered from the bench at Montreal, Quebec, on January 15, 2013. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: PELLETIER J.A. Date: 20130115 Docket: A-168-12 Citation: 2013 FCA 8 CORAM: NOËL J.A. PELLETIER J.A. MAINVILLE J.A. BETWEEN: STEPHAN CLICHE Appellant and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the bench at Montreal, Quebec, on January 15, 2013) PELLETIER J.A. [1] In our view, Justice de Montigny correctly identified the applicable test in paragraph 22 of his reasons. [2] We are unable to find any error in his application of the test to the facts in this case. [3] The appeal will therefore be dismissed. “J.D. Denis Pelletier” J.A. Certified true translation Erich Klein FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-168-12 (APPEAL FROM A JUDGMENT OF JUSTICE DE MONTIGNY OF THE FEDERAL COURT DATED MAY 10, 2012, DOCKET NO. T-711-11) STYLE OF CAUSE: Stephan Cliche v. Attorney General of Canada PLACE OF HEARING: Montreal, Quebec DATE OF HEARING: January 15, 2013 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: NOËL J.A. PELLETIER J…
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Cliche v. Canada (Attorney General) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2013-01-15 Neutral citation 2013 FCA 8 File numbers A-168-12 Decision Content Date: 20130115 Docket: A-168-12 Citation: 2013 FCA 8 CORAM: NOËL J.A. PELLETIER J.A. MAINVILLE J.A. BETWEEN: STEPHAN CLICHE Appellant and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent Hearing held at Montreal, Quebec, on January 15, 2013. Judgment delivered from the bench at Montreal, Quebec, on January 15, 2013. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: PELLETIER J.A. Date: 20130115 Docket: A-168-12 Citation: 2013 FCA 8 CORAM: NOËL J.A. PELLETIER J.A. MAINVILLE J.A. BETWEEN: STEPHAN CLICHE Appellant and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the bench at Montreal, Quebec, on January 15, 2013) PELLETIER J.A. [1] In our view, Justice de Montigny correctly identified the applicable test in paragraph 22 of his reasons. [2] We are unable to find any error in his application of the test to the facts in this case. [3] The appeal will therefore be dismissed. “J.D. Denis Pelletier” J.A. Certified true translation Erich Klein FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-168-12 (APPEAL FROM A JUDGMENT OF JUSTICE DE MONTIGNY OF THE FEDERAL COURT DATED MAY 10, 2012, DOCKET NO. T-711-11) STYLE OF CAUSE: Stephan Cliche v. Attorney General of Canada PLACE OF HEARING: Montreal, Quebec DATE OF HEARING: January 15, 2013 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: NOËL J.A. PELLETIER J.A. MAINVILLE J.A. DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: PELLETIER J.A. APPEARANCES: Stephan Cliche SELF-REPRESENTED Antoine Lippé FOR THE RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: William F. Pentney Deputy Attorney General of Canada FOR THE RESPONDENT
Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca