Skip to main content
Federal Court of Appeal· 2001

Supreme Steel Ltd. v. Canada

2001 FCA 21
GeneralJD
Cite or share
Share via WhatsAppEmail
Showing the official court-reporter headnote. An editorial brief (facts · issues · held · ratio · significance) is on the roadmap for this case. The judgment text below is the authoritative source.

Court headnote

Supreme Steel Ltd. v. Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2001-02-16 Neutral citation 2001 FCA 21 File numbers A-562-96 Decision Content Date: 20010216 Docket: A-562-96 CORAM: ROTHSTEIN, J.A. SHARLOW, J.A. MALONE, J.A. BETWEEN: SUPREME STEEL LTD. Appellant (Respondent) - and - HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent (Appellant) Heard at Edmonton, Alberta, on Friday, February 16th, 2001. JUDGMENT delivered at Edmonton, Alberta, on Friday, February 16th, 2001. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: ROTHSTEIN, J.A. CONCURRED BY: SHARLOW, J.A. MALONE, J.A. Date: 20010216 Docket: A-562-96 Neutral Citation: 2001 FCA 21 CORAM: ROTHSTEIN, J.A. SHARLOW, J.A. MALONE, J.A. BETWEEN: SUPREME STEEL LTD. Appellant (Respondent) - and - HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent (Appellant) REASONS FOR JUDGMENT ROTHSTEIN, J.A.: _. In spite of the able argument of counsel for the Appellant, we are unable to conclude that there was any error in the judgment of Sobier, J. The appeal will be dismissed with costs. "Marshall E. Rothstein" J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-562-96 STYLE OF CAUSE: Supreme Steel Ltd. v. Her Majesty the Queen PLACE OF HEARING: Edmonton, Alberta DATE OF HEARING: February 16, 2001 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY ROTHSTEIN, J.A. CONCURRED IN BY: Sharlow, J.A. Malone, J.A. DATED: February 16, 2001 APPEARANCES: James W. Joosse FOR THE APPELLANT Julia S. Parker FOR THE RESPONDENT Department of Justice SOLICITORS OF RECORD: James W. Joosse …

Read full judgment
Supreme Steel Ltd. v. Canada
Court (s) Database
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date
2001-02-16
Neutral citation
2001 FCA 21
File numbers
A-562-96
Decision Content
Date: 20010216
Docket: A-562-96
CORAM: ROTHSTEIN, J.A.
SHARLOW, J.A.
MALONE, J.A.
BETWEEN:
SUPREME STEEL LTD.
Appellant (Respondent)
- and -
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Respondent (Appellant)
Heard at Edmonton, Alberta, on Friday, February 16th, 2001.
JUDGMENT delivered at Edmonton, Alberta, on Friday, February 16th, 2001.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: ROTHSTEIN, J.A.
CONCURRED BY: SHARLOW, J.A.
MALONE, J.A.
Date: 20010216
Docket: A-562-96
Neutral Citation: 2001 FCA 21
CORAM: ROTHSTEIN, J.A.
SHARLOW, J.A.
MALONE, J.A.
BETWEEN:
SUPREME STEEL LTD.
Appellant (Respondent)
- and -
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Respondent (Appellant)
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
ROTHSTEIN, J.A.:
_. In spite of the able argument of counsel for the Appellant, we are unable to conclude that there was any error in the judgment of Sobier, J. The appeal will be dismissed with costs.
"Marshall E. Rothstein"
J.A.
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: A-562-96
STYLE OF CAUSE: Supreme Steel Ltd. v. Her Majesty the Queen
PLACE OF HEARING: Edmonton, Alberta
DATE OF HEARING: February 16, 2001
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY ROTHSTEIN, J.A.
CONCURRED IN BY: Sharlow, J.A.
Malone, J.A.
DATED: February 16, 2001
APPEARANCES:
James W. Joosse FOR THE APPELLANT
Julia S. Parker FOR THE RESPONDENT
Department of Justice
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
James W. Joosse FOR THE APPELLANT
Morris Rosenberg FOR THE RESPONDENT
Deputy Attorney General of Canada

Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca

Related cases