R. v. Sharma
Court headnote
R. v. Sharma Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1991-10-01 Report [1991] 3 SCR 119 Case number 21993 Judges Lamer, Antonio; La Forest, Gérard V.; Sopinka, John; Gonthier, Charles Doherty; McLachlin, Beverley; Stevenson, William; Iacobucci, Frank On appeal from Ontario Subjects Courts Notes SCC Case Information: 21993 Decision Content R. v. Sharma, [1991] 3 S.C.R. 119 Sneb Lata Sharma Appellant v. Her Majesty The Queen Respondent and The Attorney General of Canada Intervener Indexed as: R. v. Sharma File No.: 21993. 1991: October 1. Present: Lamer C.J. and La Forest, Sopinka, Gonthier, McLachlin, Stevenson and Iacobucci JJ. on appeal from the court of appeal for ontario Courts ‑‑ Jurisdiction ‑‑ Unreasonable delay ‑‑ Proceedings stayed ‑‑ Appeal court without jurisdiction to entertain Crown appeal. APPEAL from a judgment of the Ontario Court of Appeal allowing an appeal from and setting aside the order staying proceedings by White Prov. Ct. J. Irwin Koziebrocki and David E. Buckman, for the appellant. Murray D. Segal and Kenneth L. Campbell, for the respondent. S. R. Fainstein, Q.C., and R. J. Frater, for the intervener. //Lamer C.J.// The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by Lamer C.J. -- In the appeal R. v. Sharma, on consent of both parties, and given the fact that the Ontario Court of Appeal was without jurisdiction to entertain the Crown appeal to that court, we allow the appeal, quash the order of the Court of Appeal, and restore the stay entered by the tri…
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.scc-csc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
R. v. Sharma Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1991-10-01 Report [1991] 3 SCR 119 Case number 21993 Judges Lamer, Antonio; La Forest, Gérard V.; Sopinka, John; Gonthier, Charles Doherty; McLachlin, Beverley; Stevenson, William; Iacobucci, Frank On appeal from Ontario Subjects Courts Notes SCC Case Information: 21993 Decision Content R. v. Sharma, [1991] 3 S.C.R. 119 Sneb Lata Sharma Appellant v. Her Majesty The Queen Respondent and The Attorney General of Canada Intervener Indexed as: R. v. Sharma File No.: 21993. 1991: October 1. Present: Lamer C.J. and La Forest, Sopinka, Gonthier, McLachlin, Stevenson and Iacobucci JJ. on appeal from the court of appeal for ontario Courts ‑‑ Jurisdiction ‑‑ Unreasonable delay ‑‑ Proceedings stayed ‑‑ Appeal court without jurisdiction to entertain Crown appeal. APPEAL from a judgment of the Ontario Court of Appeal allowing an appeal from and setting aside the order staying proceedings by White Prov. Ct. J. Irwin Koziebrocki and David E. Buckman, for the appellant. Murray D. Segal and Kenneth L. Campbell, for the respondent. S. R. Fainstein, Q.C., and R. J. Frater, for the intervener. //Lamer C.J.// The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by Lamer C.J. -- In the appeal R. v. Sharma, on consent of both parties, and given the fact that the Ontario Court of Appeal was without jurisdiction to entertain the Crown appeal to that court, we allow the appeal, quash the order of the Court of Appeal, and restore the stay entered by the trial judge. Judgment accordingly. Solicitor for the appellant: Irwin Koziebrocki, Toronto. Solicitor for the respondent: The Attorney General for Ontario, Toronto. Solicitor for the intervener: John C. Tait, Ottawa.
Source: decisions.scc-csc.ca
Administration des aéroports régionaux d’Edmonton c. Thibodeau
2024 CAF 196