Goodswimmer v. Canada (Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development)

Goodswimmer v. Canada (Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development)
Collection
Supreme Court Judgments
Date
1997-02-18
Report
[1997] 1 SCR 309
Case number
24737, 24745
Judges
Lamer, Antonio; La Forest, Gérard V.; L'Heureux-Dubé, Claire; Sopinka, John; Gonthier, Charles Doherty; Cory, Peter deCarteret; McLachlin, Beverley; Iacobucci, Frank; Major, John C.
On appeal from
Federal Court of Appeal
Subjects
Appeal
Notes
SCC Case Information: 24737, 24745
Decision Content
Goodswimmer v. Canada (Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development), [1997] 1 S.C.R. 309
Alfred Goodswimmer, Keith Goodswimmer,
Jerry Goodswimmer and Ron Sunshine
on their own behalf and on behalf of other
members of the Sturgeon Lake Indian Band,
the Council of the Sturgeon Lake Indian Band,
Mary Kappo, Mary Delphine Goodswimmer,
Lucy Sunshine, Louise Redhead, Cecile Kiyawasew,
Marina Plante, Florestine Chowace,
Florence Standingribbon, Wilfred Goodswimmer
and the Lesser Slave Lake Indian Regional Council Appellants
v.
The Attorney General of Canada, the Minister of
Indian Affairs and Northern Development and
Darlene Desjarlais, in her capacity as
Chief of the Sturgeon Lake Indian Band Respondents
Indexed as: Goodswimmer v. Canada (Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development)
File Nos.: 24737, 24745.
1997: February 18.
Present: Lamer C.J. and La Forest, L’Heureux‑Dubé, Sopinka, Gonthier, Cory, McLachlin, Iacobucci and Major JJ.
on appeal from the federal court of appeal
Appeals -- Appeals to Supreme Court of Canada -- Mootness -- Court not exercising discretion to hear appeal notwithstanding mootness -- Appeal quashed.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Federal Court of Appeal, [1995] 2 F.C. 389, 180 N.R. 184, 123 D.L.R. (4th) 93, [1995] 3 C.N.L.R. 72, affirming an order of the Federal Court, Trial Division (1993), 66 F.T.R. 279, [1994] 2 C.N.L.R. 56, answering a question of law. Appeal quashed.
Catherine M. Twinn, Martin J. Henderson and Philip P. Healey, for the appellants.
Kirk N. Lambrecht, for the respondents the Attorney General of Canada and the Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development.
//The Chief Justice//
The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by
1 The Chief Justice -- It has been conceded by the appellants that this appeal is moot. In all of the circumstances we are of the view that this is not one of those appeals in which the Court should exercise its discretion to hear the appeal notwithstanding its mootness.
2 Accordingly, this appeal is quashed. However, the Crown not having moved to quash with due diligence, costs of the appeal on a party to party basis are granted to the appellants.
Judgment accordingly.
Solicitor for the appellants: Catherine M. Twinn, Slave Lake, Alberta.
Solicitor for the respondents the Attorney General of Canada and the Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development: George Thomson, Ottawa.