Skip to main content
Federal Court of Appeal· 2006

Tucker v. Canada

2006 FCA 221
GeneralJD
Cite or share
Share via WhatsAppEmail
Showing the official court-reporter headnote. An editorial brief (facts · issues · held · ratio · significance) is on the roadmap for this case. The judgment text below is the authoritative source.

Court headnote

Tucker v. Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2006-06-15 Neutral citation 2006 FCA 221 File numbers 06-A-15 Decision Content Date: 20060615 Docket: 06-A-15 Citation: 2006 FCA 221 Present: NADON J.A. BETWEEN: REVEREND BROTHER WALTER A. TUCKER AND REVEREND BROTHER MICHAEL J. Applicants and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent Dealt with in writing without appearance of parties. Order delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on June 15, 2006. REASONS FOR ORDER BY: NADON J.A. Date: 20060615 Docket: 06-A-15 Citation: 2006 FCA 221 Present: NADON J.A. BETWEEN: REVEREND BROTHER WALTER A. TUCKER AND REVEREND BROTHER MICHAEL J. BALDASARO Applicants and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent REASONS FOR ORDER NADON J.A. [1] Since the applicants have not satisfied me that they have an arguable case on appeal, nor that there exist special circumstances that justify the delay in commencing their appeal, their Motion to extend the time to appeal the Orders of Heneghan J., dated December 8, 2005 and February 6, 2006, will be denied with costs to the respondent in the sum of $500. "M. Nadon" J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: 06-A-15 STYLE OF CAUSE: REV. WALTER TUCKER and REV. MICHAEL J. BALDASARO v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN MOTION DEALT WITH IN WRITING WITHOUT APPEARANCE OF PARTIES REASONS FOR ORDER BY: NADON J.A. DATED: June 15, 2006 WRITTEN REPRESENTATIONS BY: Reverend Brother Walter A. Tucker Reverend Brother Michael J. Baldasaro APPLICANTS…

Read full judgment
Tucker v. Canada
Court (s) Database
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date
2006-06-15
Neutral citation
2006 FCA 221
File numbers
06-A-15
Decision Content
Date: 20060615
Docket: 06-A-15
Citation: 2006 FCA 221
Present: NADON J.A.
BETWEEN:
REVEREND BROTHER WALTER A. TUCKER AND
REVEREND BROTHER MICHAEL J.
Applicants
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Respondent
Dealt with in writing without appearance of parties.
Order delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on June 15, 2006.
REASONS FOR ORDER BY: NADON J.A.
Date: 20060615
Docket: 06-A-15
Citation: 2006 FCA 221
Present: NADON J.A.
BETWEEN:
REVEREND BROTHER WALTER A. TUCKER AND
REVEREND BROTHER MICHAEL J. BALDASARO
Applicants
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Respondent
REASONS FOR ORDER
NADON J.A.
[1] Since the applicants have not satisfied me that they have an arguable case on appeal, nor that there exist special circumstances that justify the delay in commencing their appeal, their Motion to extend the time to appeal the Orders of Heneghan J., dated December 8, 2005 and February 6, 2006, will be denied with costs to the respondent in the sum of $500.
"M. Nadon"
J.A.
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: 06-A-15
STYLE OF CAUSE: REV. WALTER TUCKER and
REV. MICHAEL J. BALDASARO
v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
MOTION DEALT WITH IN WRITING WITHOUT APPEARANCE OF PARTIES
REASONS FOR ORDER BY: NADON J.A.
DATED: June 15, 2006
WRITTEN REPRESENTATIONS BY:
Reverend Brother Walter A. Tucker
Reverend Brother Michael J. Baldasaro
APPLICANTS ON THEIR OWN BEHALF
Christopher Leafloor
Andrea Horton
James Gorham
FOR THE RESPONDENT
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
John H. Sims Q.C.
Deputy Solicitor General of Canada
Ottawa, ON
FOR THE RESPONDENT

Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca

Related cases