Grinshpun v. Canada
Court headnote
Grinshpun v. Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2002-04-29 Neutral citation 2002 FCT 485 File numbers T-647-01 Decision Content Date: 20020429 Docket: T-647-01 Neutral citation: 2002 FCT 485 BETWEEN: LEON GRINSHPUN Plaintiff - and - HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Defendant ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS Charles E. Stinson Assessment Officer [1] The Court granted the Defendant's application, which was made on the basis that the statement of claim disclosed no reasonable cause of action, was scandalous, frivolous and vexatious and was an abuse of process, to strike the statement of claim without leave to amend and to dismiss the action with costs. I issued a timetable for written disposition of the Defendant's bill of costs. [2] The Plaintiff asserted that his constitutional rights were violated and that conspiracy, bias and prejudice in the judicial system brought it into disrepute. The Defendant argued that the difficult nature of this litigation justifies the costs as claimed. Assessment [3] The Plaintiff's position is without merit. The Defendant's bill of costs, presented at $1,580.19, is assessed and allowed at $1,580.19. (Sgd.) "Charles E. Stinson" Assessment Officer Vancouver, B.C. April 29, 2002 FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA TRIAL DIVISION NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: T-647-01 STYLE OF CAUSE: LEON GRINSHPUN Plaintiff and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Defendant ASSESSMENT OF COSTS IN WRITING WITHOUT PERSONAL APPEARANCE OF PARTIES REASONS BY: Charles E. …
Read full judgment
Grinshpun v. Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2002-04-29 Neutral citation 2002 FCT 485 File numbers T-647-01 Decision Content Date: 20020429 Docket: T-647-01 Neutral citation: 2002 FCT 485 BETWEEN: LEON GRINSHPUN Plaintiff - and - HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Defendant ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS Charles E. Stinson Assessment Officer [1] The Court granted the Defendant's application, which was made on the basis that the statement of claim disclosed no reasonable cause of action, was scandalous, frivolous and vexatious and was an abuse of process, to strike the statement of claim without leave to amend and to dismiss the action with costs. I issued a timetable for written disposition of the Defendant's bill of costs. [2] The Plaintiff asserted that his constitutional rights were violated and that conspiracy, bias and prejudice in the judicial system brought it into disrepute. The Defendant argued that the difficult nature of this litigation justifies the costs as claimed. Assessment [3] The Plaintiff's position is without merit. The Defendant's bill of costs, presented at $1,580.19, is assessed and allowed at $1,580.19. (Sgd.) "Charles E. Stinson" Assessment Officer Vancouver, B.C. April 29, 2002 FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA TRIAL DIVISION NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: T-647-01 STYLE OF CAUSE: LEON GRINSHPUN Plaintiff and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Defendant ASSESSMENT OF COSTS IN WRITING WITHOUT PERSONAL APPEARANCE OF PARTIES REASONS BY: Charles E. Stinson DATED: April 29, 2002 SOLICITORS OF RECORD Morris Rosenberg For Defendant Deputy Attorney General of Canada
Source: decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca