Tiller v. Canada
Source text
Tiller v. Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2020-08-05 Neutral citation 2020 FC 845 File numbers T-1673-17 Decision Content Date: 20200805 Docket: T-1673-17 Citation: 2020 FC 845 Ottawa, Ontario, August 5, 2020 PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Phelan CLASS PROCEEDING BETWEEN: CHERYL TILLER, MARY-ELLEN COPLAND AND DAYNA ROACH Plaintiffs and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Defendant ORDER WHEREAS this motion was made by the Representative Plaintiffs, on consent and in writing, pursuant to Rule 369 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106, for clarification of the “Implementation Date” under the Settlement Agreement approved by this Court; AND UPON READING the motion record of the Representative Plaintiffs; AND UPON the Implementation Date having been set, after extensions due to pandemic circumstances affecting Court operations, as July 16, 2020; AND UPON the implementation of the Settlement having been commenced before the Time Limits and Other Periods Act (COVID-19), SC 2020, c. 11 [Covid Act]; AND HAVING CONSIDERED that no appeals or leaves to appeal have been filed or are likely to be filed; AND HAVING CONSIDERED that the motion is in the best interests of the Class and is within the Court’s discretion to grant; THIS COURT ORDERS that the Implementation Date of the Settlement of this class action remains July 16, 2020, and has not been impacted by the Time Limits and Other Periods Act (COVID-19), SC 2020, c 11. blank “Michael L. Phelan” blank Judge …
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Tiller v. Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2020-08-05 Neutral citation 2020 FC 845 File numbers T-1673-17 Decision Content Date: 20200805 Docket: T-1673-17 Citation: 2020 FC 845 Ottawa, Ontario, August 5, 2020 PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Phelan CLASS PROCEEDING BETWEEN: CHERYL TILLER, MARY-ELLEN COPLAND AND DAYNA ROACH Plaintiffs and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Defendant ORDER WHEREAS this motion was made by the Representative Plaintiffs, on consent and in writing, pursuant to Rule 369 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106, for clarification of the “Implementation Date” under the Settlement Agreement approved by this Court; AND UPON READING the motion record of the Representative Plaintiffs; AND UPON the Implementation Date having been set, after extensions due to pandemic circumstances affecting Court operations, as July 16, 2020; AND UPON the implementation of the Settlement having been commenced before the Time Limits and Other Periods Act (COVID-19), SC 2020, c. 11 [Covid Act]; AND HAVING CONSIDERED that no appeals or leaves to appeal have been filed or are likely to be filed; AND HAVING CONSIDERED that the motion is in the best interests of the Class and is within the Court’s discretion to grant; THIS COURT ORDERS that the Implementation Date of the Settlement of this class action remains July 16, 2020, and has not been impacted by the Time Limits and Other Periods Act (COVID-19), SC 2020, c 11. blank “Michael L. Phelan” blank Judge
Source: decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca
Administration des aéroports régionaux d’Edmonton c. Thibodeau
2024 CAF 196