Skip to main content
Federal Court of Appeal· 2004

Ouellet v. Canada (Attorney General)

2004 FCA 95
Quebec civil lawJD
Cite or share
Share via WhatsAppEmail
Showing the official court-reporter headnote. An editorial brief (facts · issues · held · ratio · significance) is on the roadmap for this case. The judgment text below is the authoritative source.

Court headnote

Ouellet v. Canada (Attorney General) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2004-03-04 Neutral citation 2004 FCA 95 File numbers A-37-02 Decision Content Date: 20040304 Docket: A-37-02 Citation: 2004 FCA 95 Between: ADRIEN OUELLET Appellant and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS MICHELLE LAMY, ASSESSMENT OFFICER [1] This is an appeal from a Federal Court judgment dismissed with costs on January 13, 2003. The present assessment proceeded without a personal appearance by the parties. [2] Once costs are awarded by the Court, the function of the assessment officer is to determine the amount thereof in keeping with the Federal Court Rules, 1998, and Tariff B. Based on the submissions of the parties, therefore, it seems reasonable to allow the respondent the sum of $1,342.00 for services rendered under items 19 (5 units), 22(a) (2 units x 2h06) and 26 (3 units). The expenses incurred in this case in the amount of $45.41 are awarded as requested. [3] The respondent's bill of costs is assessed in the amount of $1,387.41. A certificate is issued for that amount. "Michelle Lamy" Assessment Officer MONTRÉAL, QUEBEC March 4, 2004 Certified true translation Suzanne M. Gauthier, C Tr, LLL FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL SOLICITORS OF RECORD COURT FILE No.: A-37-02 Between: ADRIEN OUELLET Appellant and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent ASSESSMENT OF COSTS WITHOUT PERSONAL APPEARANCE PLACE OF ASSESSMENT: Montréal, Quebec REASONS BY: MIC…

Read full judgment
Ouellet v. Canada (Attorney General)
Court (s) Database
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date
2004-03-04
Neutral citation
2004 FCA 95
File numbers
A-37-02
Decision Content
Date: 20040304
Docket: A-37-02
Citation: 2004 FCA 95
Between:
ADRIEN OUELLET
Appellant
and
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
Respondent
ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS
MICHELLE LAMY, ASSESSMENT OFFICER
[1] This is an appeal from a Federal Court judgment dismissed with costs on January 13, 2003. The present assessment proceeded without a personal appearance by the parties.
[2] Once costs are awarded by the Court, the function of the assessment officer is to determine the amount thereof in keeping with the Federal Court Rules, 1998, and Tariff B. Based on the submissions of the parties, therefore, it seems reasonable to allow the respondent the sum of $1,342.00 for services rendered under items 19 (5 units), 22(a) (2 units x 2h06) and 26 (3 units). The expenses incurred in this case in the amount of $45.41 are awarded as requested.
[3] The respondent's bill of costs is assessed in the amount of $1,387.41. A certificate is issued for that amount.
"Michelle Lamy"
Assessment Officer
MONTRÉAL, QUEBEC
March 4, 2004
Certified true translation
Suzanne M. Gauthier, C Tr, LLL
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
SOLICITORS OF RECORD
COURT FILE No.: A-37-02
Between: ADRIEN OUELLET
Appellant
and
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
Respondent
ASSESSMENT OF COSTS WITHOUT PERSONAL APPEARANCE
PLACE OF ASSESSMENT: Montréal, Quebec
REASONS BY: MICHELLE LAMY, ASSESSMENT OFFICER
DATED: March 4, 2004
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Labelle, Boudrault, Côté et Associés for the appellant
Montréal, Quebec
Morris Rosenberg for the respondent
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
Ottawa, Ontario

Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca

Related cases