Lee v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)
Court headnote
Lee v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2004-03-31 Neutral citation 2004 FCA 143 File numbers A-308-03 Notes Digest Decision Content Date: 20040331 Docket: A-308-03 Citation: 2004 FCA 143 CORAM: DÉCARY J.A. EVANS J.A. PELLETIER J.A. BETWEEN: LAI SHEUNG EVA LEE Appellant and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on March 31, 2004. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on March 31, 2004. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: DÉCARY J.A. Date: 20040331 Docket: A-308-03 Citation: 2004 FCA 143 CORAM: DÉCARY J.A. EVANS J.A. PELLETIER J.A. BETWEEN: LAI SHEUNG EVA LEE Appellant and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT (Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on March 31, 2004) DÉCARY J.A. [1] We are in substantial agreement with the reasons for judgment of Madam Justice Layden-Stevenson reported at (2003) 30 Imm. L.R. (3d) 273 (F.C.T.D.). [2] The following certified question: Where a visa officer refuses an application for permanent residence on redetermination, after a previous decision was set aside by the court, is the visa officer obliged to specifically state or set out the differences between the two decisions? is answered in the negative. [3] The appeal is dismissed. "Robert Décary" J.A. FEDERAL COURT Names of Counsel and Solicitors of Record DOCKET: A-308-03 STYLE OF CAUSE: LAI SHEUNG EVA LEE Applic…
Read full judgment
Lee v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2004-03-31 Neutral citation 2004 FCA 143 File numbers A-308-03 Notes Digest Decision Content Date: 20040331 Docket: A-308-03 Citation: 2004 FCA 143 CORAM: DÉCARY J.A. EVANS J.A. PELLETIER J.A. BETWEEN: LAI SHEUNG EVA LEE Appellant and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on March 31, 2004. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on March 31, 2004. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: DÉCARY J.A. Date: 20040331 Docket: A-308-03 Citation: 2004 FCA 143 CORAM: DÉCARY J.A. EVANS J.A. PELLETIER J.A. BETWEEN: LAI SHEUNG EVA LEE Appellant and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT (Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on March 31, 2004) DÉCARY J.A. [1] We are in substantial agreement with the reasons for judgment of Madam Justice Layden-Stevenson reported at (2003) 30 Imm. L.R. (3d) 273 (F.C.T.D.). [2] The following certified question: Where a visa officer refuses an application for permanent residence on redetermination, after a previous decision was set aside by the court, is the visa officer obliged to specifically state or set out the differences between the two decisions? is answered in the negative. [3] The appeal is dismissed. "Robert Décary" J.A. FEDERAL COURT Names of Counsel and Solicitors of Record DOCKET: A-308-03 STYLE OF CAUSE: LAI SHEUNG EVA LEE Applicant and MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent PLACE OF HEARING: TORONTO, ONTARIO DATE OF HEARING: MARCH 31, 2004 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: (DECARY, EVANS, PELLETIER JJ.A.). DELIVERD FROM THE BENCH BY: DÈCARY J.A. APPEARANCES BY: Cecil Rotenberg For the Applicant Marissa Bielski For the Respondent SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Cecil Rotenberg, Q.C. Toronto, Ontario For the Applicant Morris Rosenberg Deputy Attorney General of Canada For the Respondent
Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca