Doucet v. Canada (Attorney General)
Source text
Doucet v. Canada (Attorney General) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2005-02-28 Neutral citation 2005 FCA 80 File numbers A-32-04 Decision Content Date: 20050228 Docket: A-32-04 Citation: 2005 FCA 80 CORAM: DESJARDINS J.A. LÉTOURNEAU J.A. PELLETIER J.A. BETWEEN: JACQUES DOUCET Applicant and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on February 28, 2005. Judgment delivered at Fredericton, NB, on February 28, 2005. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: DESJARDINS J.A. CONCURRED IN BY: LÉTOURNEAU J.A. PELLETIER J.A. Date: 20050228 Docket: A-32-04 Citation: 2005 FCA 80 CORAM: DESJARDINS J.A. LÉTOURNEAU J.A PELLETIER J.A. BETWEEN: JACQUES DOUCET Applicant and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT (Delivered from the Bench at Fredericton, NB, on February 28, 2005) DESJARDINS J.A. [1] We find no reviewable error in the decision made by the Umpire. [2] In essence, the Board of referees made a finding of credibility against the Applicant. We cannot say that the Umpire erred in refusing to intervene nor can we second-guess the decisions made by both the Board of referees and the Umpire. [3] This application will be dismissed with costs. "Alice Desjardins" J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-32-04 STYLE OF CAUSE: Jacques Doucet and AGC PLACE OF HEARING: Fredericton, New Brunswick DATE OF HEARING: February 28, 2005 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: A. Desjardins, JA CONCURRED IN BY: G. L…
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Doucet v. Canada (Attorney General) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2005-02-28 Neutral citation 2005 FCA 80 File numbers A-32-04 Decision Content Date: 20050228 Docket: A-32-04 Citation: 2005 FCA 80 CORAM: DESJARDINS J.A. LÉTOURNEAU J.A. PELLETIER J.A. BETWEEN: JACQUES DOUCET Applicant and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on February 28, 2005. Judgment delivered at Fredericton, NB, on February 28, 2005. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: DESJARDINS J.A. CONCURRED IN BY: LÉTOURNEAU J.A. PELLETIER J.A. Date: 20050228 Docket: A-32-04 Citation: 2005 FCA 80 CORAM: DESJARDINS J.A. LÉTOURNEAU J.A PELLETIER J.A. BETWEEN: JACQUES DOUCET Applicant and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT (Delivered from the Bench at Fredericton, NB, on February 28, 2005) DESJARDINS J.A. [1] We find no reviewable error in the decision made by the Umpire. [2] In essence, the Board of referees made a finding of credibility against the Applicant. We cannot say that the Umpire erred in refusing to intervene nor can we second-guess the decisions made by both the Board of referees and the Umpire. [3] This application will be dismissed with costs. "Alice Desjardins" J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-32-04 STYLE OF CAUSE: Jacques Doucet and AGC PLACE OF HEARING: Fredericton, New Brunswick DATE OF HEARING: February 28, 2005 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: A. Desjardins, JA CONCURRED IN BY: G. Létourneau, JA D. Pelletier, JA DATED: February 28, 2005 APPEARANCES: Terrence Lenihan FOR THE APPLICANT Stacey Gerrard FOR THE RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Byrne, Lenihan & Associates Bathurst, New Brunswick FOR THE APPLICANT John Simms, Deputy Attorney General for Canada Department of Justice Halifax, Nova Scotia FOR THE RESPONDENT
Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca
Administration des aéroports régionaux d’Edmonton c. Thibodeau
2024 CAF 196