Oberlander v. Canada (Attorney General)
Court headnote
Oberlander v. Canada (Attorney General) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2002-10-09 Neutral citation 2002 FCA 377 File numbers A-365-02 Decision Content Date: 20021009 Docket: A-365-02 Neutral citation: 2002 FCA 377 Present: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NADON BETWEEN: HELMUT OBERLANDER Appellant and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent Motion dealt with in writing without appearance of parties. Order delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 9, 2002. REASONS FOR ORDER BY: NADON J.A. Date: 20021009 Docket: A-365-02 Neutral citation: 2002 FCA 377 Present: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NADON BETWEEN: HELMUT OBERLANDER Appellant and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent REASONS FOR ORDER [1] By its motion, the respondent seeks an order quashing the appellant's Notice of Appeal dated August 15, 2002. [2] Since, in my view, the issue raised in the respondent's motion should not be decided without the benefit of oral argument, it is preferable to defer the matter to the panel hearing the appeal. Consequently, the respondent should raise and discuss the jurisdictional issue in its Memorandum, along with the other issues which arise from this appeal. [3] The motion shall therefore be dismissed with costs in the cause. "M. Nadon" J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-365-02 STYLE OF CAUSE: Helmut Oberlander v. A.G.C. MOTION DEALT WITH IN WRITING WITHOUT APPEARANCE OF PARTIES REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER BY: NADON J.A…
Read full judgment
Oberlander v. Canada (Attorney General) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2002-10-09 Neutral citation 2002 FCA 377 File numbers A-365-02 Decision Content Date: 20021009 Docket: A-365-02 Neutral citation: 2002 FCA 377 Present: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NADON BETWEEN: HELMUT OBERLANDER Appellant and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent Motion dealt with in writing without appearance of parties. Order delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 9, 2002. REASONS FOR ORDER BY: NADON J.A. Date: 20021009 Docket: A-365-02 Neutral citation: 2002 FCA 377 Present: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NADON BETWEEN: HELMUT OBERLANDER Appellant and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent REASONS FOR ORDER [1] By its motion, the respondent seeks an order quashing the appellant's Notice of Appeal dated August 15, 2002. [2] Since, in my view, the issue raised in the respondent's motion should not be decided without the benefit of oral argument, it is preferable to defer the matter to the panel hearing the appeal. Consequently, the respondent should raise and discuss the jurisdictional issue in its Memorandum, along with the other issues which arise from this appeal. [3] The motion shall therefore be dismissed with costs in the cause. "M. Nadon" J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-365-02 STYLE OF CAUSE: Helmut Oberlander v. A.G.C. MOTION DEALT WITH IN WRITING WITHOUT APPEARANCE OF PARTIES REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER BY: NADON J.A. DATED: October 9, 2002 WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS BY: BARBARA JACKMAN FOR THE APPELLANT ERIC HAFEMANN DONALD A. MacINTOSH FOR THE RESPONDENT and JOHN LONCAR SOLICITORS OF RECORD: BARBARA JACKMAN FOR THE APPELLANT Toronto, Ontario. ERIC HAFEMANN Waterloo, Ontario. MORRIS ROSENBERG FOR THE RESPONDENT Attorney General of Canada
Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca