Van Nest v. Van Nest
Court headnote
Van Nest v. Van Nest Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1979-04-24 Report [1979] 1 SCR 983 Judges Laskin, Bora; Martland, Ronald; Ritchie, Roland Almon; Dickson, Robert George Brian; Pratte, Yves On appeal from Quebec Subjects Action Decision Content Supreme Court of Canada Van Nest v. Van Nest, [1979] 1 S.C.R. 983 Date: 1979-04-24 F. Paul Van Nest Applicant; and Edna R. Van Nest Respondent. 1979: April 24. Coram: Laskin C.J. and Martland, Ritchie, Dickson and Pratte JJ. APPLICATION FOR REHEARING OF MOTION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL Practice—Motion for leave to appeal dismissed—Application for rehearing of motion dismissed. APPLICATION for rehearing of applicant’s motion for leave to appeal. Application dismissed. The judgment of the Court was delivered by THE CHIEF JUSTICE—This is an application for a rehearing of a motion for leave to appeal which was dismissed by an order of this Court on January 24, 1979. It is not the practice of this Court to grant rehearings of motions for leave and I would, accordingly, dismiss the application. There will be no order as to costs. Judgment accordingly. …
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.scc-csc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Van Nest v. Van Nest Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1979-04-24 Report [1979] 1 SCR 983 Judges Laskin, Bora; Martland, Ronald; Ritchie, Roland Almon; Dickson, Robert George Brian; Pratte, Yves On appeal from Quebec Subjects Action Decision Content Supreme Court of Canada Van Nest v. Van Nest, [1979] 1 S.C.R. 983 Date: 1979-04-24 F. Paul Van Nest Applicant; and Edna R. Van Nest Respondent. 1979: April 24. Coram: Laskin C.J. and Martland, Ritchie, Dickson and Pratte JJ. APPLICATION FOR REHEARING OF MOTION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL Practice—Motion for leave to appeal dismissed—Application for rehearing of motion dismissed. APPLICATION for rehearing of applicant’s motion for leave to appeal. Application dismissed. The judgment of the Court was delivered by THE CHIEF JUSTICE—This is an application for a rehearing of a motion for leave to appeal which was dismissed by an order of this Court on January 24, 1979. It is not the practice of this Court to grant rehearings of motions for leave and I would, accordingly, dismiss the application. There will be no order as to costs. Judgment accordingly.
Source: decisions.scc-csc.ca
Quebec (Attorney General) v A
[2013] 1 SCR 61